Raymond James CEO Paul Reilly talks taxes and the firm's earnings

Executive says the pass-through cut to 15% would be a boon to some advisers, but the rate is too low for corporations in terms of gaining bipartisan support and being revenue-neutral

Apr 27, 2017 @ 5:51 pm

By Bruce Kelly

President Donald J. Trump's proposal this week to cut the tax rate to 15% for pass-through businesses, under which many independent financial advisers operate, "came out of the blue and was a surprise" and, if enacted, would be a boon to those advisers, said Paul Reilly, CEO and chairman of Raymond James Financial Inc.

"All I've seen is news flashes, so it's hard to say. But as I understand the proposal today, if you are an S Corp or a limited liability partnership, the income is passed to you and you are taxed at individual income tax rates, which is currently 39%," Mr. Reilly said Thursday morning. He was speaking to reporters during the annual Elevate meeting for Raymond James Financial Services Inc., the independent broker-dealer unit under the Raymond James Financial roof.

"What I understood the solution to be was to tax you like a corporation, which is proposed to go down to 15%," he said. "That means, yes, there would be a great tax benefit [to advisers this applies to], if that is what happens."

Meanwhile, Mr. Trump's plan to cut corporate tax rates to 15% from the current high marginal tax rate of 39% could prove to be a bridge too far, particularly if the federal deficit were to increase, Mr. Reilly said.

"A 15% corporate tax rate seems pretty darn low to me," Mr. Reilly said. "I think we are high, but I don't know if that's a proposal to negotiate off of or a serious rate, but it's pretty low."

He suggested benchmarking the United States to other industrial countries.

"It appears to me to get support to lower corporate taxes, to get bipartisan support, the rate would have to be somewhere in the mid-20% range," he said. "Below that, I think the question is going to be, what are you doing to the deficit. How are you making that up? What's revenue-neutral?"


Raymond James Financial reported earnings Wednesday for the quarter ending in March, its second quarter for fiscal 2017, which ends in September. Its private client group reported record revenues of $1.09 billion, up 23% from the same period in fiscal 2016. However, pre-tax income in the group was negatively impacted by the $100 million of legal reserves during the quarter for the previously announced $150 million settlement associated with the Jay Peak, EB-5 matter, the company said.

Extremely low adviser turnover and strong recruiting, along with increasing assets under management and interest rates, "have driven strong financial results," Mr Reilly said. "It's all helped generate the best six-month start [to the company's fiscal year] we've ever had."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print