Fee pressure has RIAs considering moving from AUM to retainer model

Asset-based pricing still rules, but retainers are expected to gain ground

May 26, 2017 @ 2:00 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

As investors become increasingly cost conscious and more savvy about fees, some financial advisers claim to be poised to field any and all challenges by embracing a retainer-fee model.

Unlike the more popular model of charging clients based on assets under management, the retainer, or flat fee, structure places more emphasis on planning and less on investment performance. Retainer fees also allow advisers to work with younger clients and those who don't have a lot of assets.

"I have some clients without a lot of money, but they require a lot of work on the planning side, and on the flip side I have clients with a lot of money who don't need a lot of planning work, so it's not right to be charging based on assets," said Carolyn McClanahan, founder and director of financial planning at Life Planning Partners.

Ms. McClanahan, who adopted the retainer-fee model in 2006 after two years of using the more traditional AUM model, sets annual retainers based on the complexity of the client's financial situation.

Her annual fees range from $10,000 to $50,000, and those fees are adjusted as the complexity of a client's plan changes.

"The most difficult challenge we have is explaining retainer fees to clients who are used to asset-based fees, but we can usually show them how they would be paying more under an asset-based structure," she said.

According to the most recent benchmarking study from Fidelity Investments, about 98% of advisers still use asset-based pricing, while retainer fees are used by just 8% of advisers.

Market forces, including increased regulatory oversight and growing fee pressure coming from the rise of robo-advice platforms, are pushing more advisers to at least consider retainer fees, according to Mathias Hitchcock, vice president of practice management and consulting at Fidelity Clearing & Custody Solutions.

"Retainer fees should initially rise in popularity as investment management fees become more commoditized and firms seek to target new client segments," he said.

Like most fee structures, retainers are highly customizable. Fidelity separates them into two main categories: comprehensive retainers that include multiple services, and retainers that are priced based on specific services.

Fidelity's research shows that the median retainer fee charged is $5,000 annually.

Veteran advisor Tim Holsworth, president of AHP Financial Services, which manages $180 million, is in the majority and plans to keep charging clients based on assets.

"I almost never use retainer fees," he said. "It doesn't fit out business model, and I think it's very hard to make a living on advice only."

But advisers who have embraced retainer fees typically find the pros outweigh the cons.

"My clients like retainer fees because they don't feel like I'm trying to sell them something," said Darin Shebesta, vice president at Jackson Roskelley Wealth Advisors.

"I love it, and I believe it is the future of our industry," he added. "We charge one flat dollar amount and we do everything, including the asset management."

Mr. Shebesta charges an initial fee starting at $2,500, then an annual retainer that can go as high at $3,000 per year, depending on the complexity of the account.

"It's something I started to pick up when I started working with the next gen clients, because a lot of that group doesn't have the assets to necessitate asset-based fees," he said. "It also takes away that conversation with clients about fees when the investment account is down."

Proponents of retainer fees often acknowledge the potential limits on revenue, since fees don't go up in stride with the investment portfolio the way they do when clients are charged based on AUM.

"You can only work with so many clients, so, logically, you can cap your revenues by charging retainer fees, unless you keep raising your fees," said Roger Ma, owner of the advisory firm Lifelaidout.

Mr. Ma, who launched his business last year, charges clients an initial fee of between $1,000 and $5,000, then a monthly retainer of between $100 and $500.

"Charging a retainer puts your fees where the value is," he said. "I just don't agree that if you're able to increase the assets the client should pay higher fees."

For Kristi Sullivan, owner of Sullivan Financial Planning, retainer fees make sense for the clients, but it does increase the risk of a client leaving once the initial plan is set up.

"I offer an annual retainer to clients after an initial financial plan, which includes plan updates, meetings and unlimited calls to me for questions and advice," she said. "The pros are that the client has a follow-up beyond the original plan. But the income can become less predictable because once people are on a good path they might feel like they don't need the retainer after a year or two."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

May 02


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Top questions surrounding future of DOL fiduciary rule

Reporter Greg Iacurci and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the biggest uncertainties springing from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to vacate the regulation.

Latest news & opinion

Stocks plunge, advisers tell clients to hang tight

Though planners encourage calm, some are preparing investors for a correction.

Lightyear Capital's Donald Marron said to be in the hunt for Cetera Financial Group

The veteran brokerage executive, who bought Advisor Group in 2016, owned Cetera once before.

What to watch for next with the DOL fiduciary rule

Much hinges on whether the Labor Department appeals the 5th Circuit decision by April 30.

Social Security benefits losing buying power

Low inflation combined with rising Medicare costs threaten the adequacy of seniors' income.

Finra looks to streamline broker-dealer exams

CEO Robert Cook says three examination teams may be consolidated.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print