Labor Secretary Acosta: Concerns with DOL fiduciary rule 'not heard' during original rulemaking

Mr. Acosta also said a request for information sent yesterday to the Office of Management and Budget is the first step in its review of the fiduciary rule

Jun 7, 2017 @ 12:56 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta hinted Wednesday that the Obama administration didn't adequately consider "concerns" raised during the rulemaking process surrounding the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule.

Mr. Acosta made the remark during congressional testimony, after Rep. Steve Womack (R-Arkansas) asked: "Is it not obvious that [the fiduciary rule] is going to limit [investors'] options? Does it have some far-reaching effects that would be counterproductive to particularly younger generations' savings opportunities?"

The argument that the regulation will reduce access to investment options is common among critics of the regulation, which will raise investment-advice standards in retirement accounts once its phased implementation period begins June 9.

"There are concerns. Those concerns were voiced in the original rulemaking process, and the prior administration made a decision that those concerns were outweighed by what the prior administration wanted to do," Mr. Acosta said in response.

"Those concerns certainly surfaced the first time around, and unfortunately they were not heard. And that's what happens," Mr. Acosta added.

The secretary made his comments during a hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies regarding the DOL's budget.

The DOL under Mr. Acosta is currently conducting a review of the fiduciary rule, as directed earlier this year by the Trump administration. The DOL has sent a request for information to the Office of Management and Budget, which received the request on Tuesday and will issue it publicly after completing a review.

The request for information will seek response from industry stakeholders and consumers about the fiduciary rule and how it's being implemented, and is "the first step in the administration's review of that rule," Mr. Acosta said.

"We need that information and we need that data in order to decide how to proceed," he added.

Micah Hauptman, financial services counsel at the Consumer Federation of America, believes Mr. Acosta is incorrect in saying the Obama administration's Labor Department didn't effectively consider the concerns of rule opponents during the rulemaking process. The previous DOL "carefully scrutinized" these arguments and "rightly determined they were meritless and self-serving," he said.

"The industry opponents' sky-is-falling claims have become even less credible as firms have implemented the rule and made statements confirming that it will benefit investors," Mr. Hauptman said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Featured video


What's the top issue on advisers minds?

Laura Pierson from Carson Group discusses how the old topic of 'Human Capital' is hot again because of millennials.

Latest news & opinion

New ways to pay for college

Experts respond to real-life scenarios of people struggling to afford higher education.

How technology is reshaping the advice business

Artificial intelligence, Amazon and robo-advisers are some of the topics on the minds of tech experts.

Best- and worst-performing sector funds and ETFs this year

A rising tide may lift all ships, but a bull market doesn't lift all stock sectors. Here are the best- and worst-performing sectors this year, with the top and bottom fund in each sector.

Supreme Court ruling on SEC judges unlikely to upend advice industry

But it could give rise to new hearings for some advisers who are already in litigation with the agency such as Dawn Bennett.

It's official: DOL fiduciary rule is dead

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate Thursday making its March 15 decision to strike down the regulation effective.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print