DOL fiduciary rule: When advisers actively seek to use BICE

Many advisers are embracing an exemption they've frequently derided, even though a less-contentious one is available for annuity sales

Jun 14, 2017 @ 2:15 pm

By Greg Iacurci

To opponents of the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule, the best-interest contract exemption is something akin to the spawn of Satan.

This provision of the rule, which raised investment advice standards in retirement accounts, allows broker-dealers to continue providing investment advice deemed conflicted by the DOL, but under certain conditions.

It inspires such ire and consternation primarily due to the fact that it exposes broker-dealers to class-action lawsuits from investors. BICE also comes with several different disclosure requirements that stakeholders are none too fond of.

Yet these very same naysayers are wholeheartedly and voluntarily embracing BICE for annuity sales through January, when the full force of the fiduciary rule is set to kick in, even though another exemption is available.

That exemption, Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24, covers the sale of insurance products such as annuities. It had previously been considered less onerous than BICE by most stakeholders, until DOL action in April reversed that line of thinking.

"BICE was bad, 84-24 was better," Duane Thompson, senior policy analyst at fi360 Inc., a fiduciary consulting firm, said of firms' thinking. "But right now it's kind of the flip side. BICE, ironically, is less onerous than 84-24."

When the Department of Labor delayed the phased implementation period of the rule by 60 days, to June 9 from April 10, it also deferred some compliance requirements of BICE until January 2018.

Until then, all that's required for those providing fiduciary investment advice is adherence to the impartial conduct standards: providing best-interest advice, receiving reasonable compensation, and making no materially misleading statements to clients.

Those impartial conduct standards also apply to PTE 84-24. However, there are additional disclosure requirements that go along with this exemption during the rule's transition period. Brokers, for instance, must disclose their initial and recurring compensation, and the client must acknowledge receipt of that information in writing and affirm the transaction.

"Folks that qualify as a fiduciary are tending to want to rely on transition BICE, because it's easier, quite frankly, than 84-24," said Bruce Ashton, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath. "There are no formal disclosure requirements, as there are under 84-24."

Previous to the DOL's rule change, firms using BICE would have had to deliver a written statement to clients acknowledging fiduciary status; state in writing the firm and adviser will comply with the impartial conduct standards and disclose material conflicts of interest; and deliver a one-time disclosure to clients if they had proprietary products or products based on third-party payments, Mr. Thompson said.

Firms' reversal in thinking on BICE is all the more striking since annuity distributors and manufacturers were in an uproar last year upon discovering indexed annuities and variable annuities were required to be sold under BICE.

During the rule's transition period, these annuities are able to be sold under PTE 84-24, but in large part firms aren't doing so, observers said.

One group that is: independent marketing organizations, which market insurance products like indexed annuities to independent insurance agents. Because of a quirk in the rule, most don't qualify to use BICE. So, at least until January, IMOs can continue selling indexed annuities under PTE 84-24.

Of course, these strategies are all in flux given the potential for the DOL to change the rule, in response to a directive from the Trump administration to review it. Some believe some provisions in BICE may be watered down, or that the January date for full rule compliance will be delayed.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Upcoming Event

May 30

Conference

Adviser Compensation & Staffing Workshop

The InvestmentNews Research team will present exclusive data and highlights from its bellwether benchmarking study that will identify best practices for setting and structuring compensation and benefits packages throughout your... Learn more

Featured video

Events

How are financial services reacting to 'Times Up?'

There is much left to be done to reach full equality, say Estee Jimerson of Envestnt, but things are improving.

Latest news & opinion

Focus Financial IPO could be a sell signal for RIAs

The $100 million stock offering will fine-tune RIA valuations.

Piwowar defends SEC's best-interest rule

SEC commissioner says the Department of Labor rule set up an 'unworkable, impossible set of standards for people to comply with.'

RIA in a Box acquired by private equity firm Aquiline Capital

New owners plan more growth for the software service provider.

IBDs with the most female reps

Here are the 10 independent-broker dealers that have the most female reps.

Supreme Court decision likely to prevent brokers from filing class-action lawsuits

However, it likely won't bar employees from filing 401(k) lawsuits against their employers.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print