DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018

Jul 24, 2017 @ 2:03 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

+ Zoom

Critics of the DOL fiduciary rule are urging the Labor Department to delay its implementation until January 2019 — or possibly longer.

"To provide needed certainty, reduce harm to investors and limit unnecessary 'sunk' costs associated with implementing requirements that the department ultimately eliminates or modifies, the department should immediately — by August 15, 2017 — issue an interim final rule delaying the January 1, 2018, applicability date to January 1, 2019," Investment Company Institute acting general counsel Dorothy Donohue and deputy general counsel David Abbey wrote in a comment letter last week.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce went a step further in its comment letter and called for the transition period for the regulation to be extended until June 30, 2019, "or a later date if needed by the department."

The DOL rule, which requires financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts, was partially implemented in June. Two provisions became applicable then — one that expanded the definition of fiduciary to include brokers, who now operate under the suitability standard, and one that implemented impartial conduct standards for advisers.

Democratic lawmakers supporting the DOL rule, called on the DOL to put the rest of the rule in place as scheduled.

"Delay of the rule would result in considerable financial harm to retirees and investors ... Delay also increases regulatory uncertainty for the industry, which has been diligently working to comply with the rule," wrote Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. and ranking member of the Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee, along with four other Senate and House colleagues who are the highest ranking minority members on labor and financial committees.

The latest comment request, whose deadline was Friday, seeks information that would justify changing the remaining parts of the rule, including the controversial best-interest contract that would allow advisers to charge variable compensation as long they enter a legally binding agreement to serve the best interests of their clients.

Few of the letters provided any new analysis of the rule, which was finalized in April 2016, although the American Council of Life Insurers said that the rule had helped to curb sales of variable annuities by 8% in the first quarter of the year.

"A lot of [the letters] had to do with delay rather than new data to change [the DOL's] opinion," said Steve Parrish, a consultant and adjunct professor of law at Drake University. "They aren't long documents with market research showing how the market is affected."

One new wrinkle was offered by the American Retirement Association, which argued that reduced disclosure requirements for advisers who charge a level fee regardless of their investment recommendations be expanded to include "rebating" and other arrangements.

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association reiterated its recommendation that the DOL work with the Securities and Exchange Commission to propose a new fiduciary rule that would "enhance the existing suitability obligation ... that would apply across all securities recommendations made to retail customers."

The DOL rule, which has been under construction since 2010, has been the subject of numerous comment requests, leading to a "general fatigue" on the issue, said George Michael Gerstein, counsel at Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young.

"It's going to be a challenge for the department to hang their hat on data and arguments that haven't already been provided in the past," Mr. Gerstein said.

Part of the focus on delaying the DOL rule may reflect opponents' desire for the SEC to weigh in.

"They really do think the big dog in town is going to get into the fight," Mr. Parrish said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Proposal to delay the DOL fiduciary rule is a turning point

Senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. and managing editor Christina Nelson discuss the Labor Department's latest move and what it means for the future of the regulation and the firms preparing for it.

Latest news & opinion

Big gains attract new money to emerging markets, but should investors stay?

An estimated $6.7 billion has flowed into emerging-market stock funds and ETFs so far this year, according to Morningstar.

Attorney blasts Finra after regulator loses insider trading case

Lawyer says it was 'slimy' of Finra to publicize the case while it was still being litigated.

Will Jeffrey Gundlach's Trump-like approach on Twitter work in financial services?

The DoubleLine CEO's attacks on Wall Street Journal reporters is igniting a discussion on what's fair game on social media.

Fidelity wins arb case against wine mogul but earns a rebuke from Finra

In the case of investor Peter Deutsch, Fidelity doesn't have to pay any compensation, but regulator said firm put its interests ahead of his.

Plaintiffs win in Tibble vs. Edison 401(k) fee case

After a decade of activity around the lawsuit, including a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court, judge rules a prudent fiduciary would have invested in institutional shares.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print