SEC charges four former reps with fraud for VA sales targeting federal employees

Brokers implied government affiliation or approval, says enforcement action

Jul 31, 2017 @ 5:30 pm

By InvestmentNews

An earlier version of this story incorrectly implied that the former brokers charged were registered with another securities firm when the allegations occured.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged four former Atlanta-area brokers with fraudulently inducing federal employees to roll over holdings from their federal Thrift Savings Plan retirement accounts into higher-fee, variable annuity products.

The activity under question took place between approximately March 2012 and November 2014 when the four brokers — Christopher Laws, Jonathan Cooke, Danny Hood and Brandon Long — were registered with LPL Financial and affiliated with Federal Employee Benefits Counselors.

The SEC's complaint, outlined in a release from the agency, charges that it was through FEBC that the brokers targeted federal employees who had sizable funds invested in the Thrift Savings Plan and were nearing retirement. The complaint alleges that the brokers misled investors concerning significant details about the variable annuity investments they recommended, including the associated fees and guaranteed investment returns. In addition, the SEC charged that the brokers fostered the misleading impression that they were in some way affiliated with or approved by the federal government.

(More: SEC charges 13 with fraud in $14 million pump-and-dump scheme)

In some instances, the SEC charged, investors were led to believe that their funds would be invested in a product that was offered, vetted or specifically selected by the savings plan. Moreover, the SEC charged that the brokers sent investors incomplete or modified transaction forms, as well as written materials they devised, that obscured that the VA was privately issued, had no connection to the savings plan and would be processed through a brokerage firm with which the brokers were associated.

The SEC said the brokers sold approximately 200 variable annuities with a total face value of approximately $40 million to federal employees, who used rollover money from their plans to fund the purchases. The brokers collectively earned approximately $1.7 million in commissions on these sales.

(More: Finra whacks mid-sized NJ broker-dealer with $325,000 fine over variable annuity sales)

The SEC said it seeks disgorgement of the brokers' "ill-gotten gains" plus interest and penalties and permanent injunctions.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Cameras roll at Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers' awards

Advisory firm winners on the top 50 InvestmentNews list of Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers explain the significance of this recognition at the Chicago awards event.

Latest news & opinion

Supreme Court decision likely to prevent brokers from filing class-action lawsuits

However, it likely won't bar employees from filing 401(k) lawsuits against their employers.

5th Circuit denies states' second attempt to defend DOL fiduciary rule

The three-judge panel split again, 2-1, in deciding not to take another look at the motion to intervene by California, New York and Oregon.

Pass-through tax strategies for business-owner clients

Shifting business structure, changing filing status and spinning off equipment are examples of ways business owners can take advantage of the deduction.

Finra anticipates oversight role for SEC advice rule

CEO Robert Cook says one area for examination could be the proposed requirement that brokers act in the best interests of their clients.

IBDs with the most CFPs

Here are the 10 independent broker-dealers that employ the most certified financial planner professionals.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print