S&P: Managers still faring miserably vs. indexes

Some bright spots in value, small-cap international

Aug 9, 2017 @ 3:11 pm

By John Waggoner

+ Zoom

Stop us if you've heard this before, but active money managers are really bad at beating their benchmark indexes.

A new report from S&P Dow Jones Indices shows that most managers in nearly every domestic equity category underperformed their respective benchmarks over the past decade, and fees made their bad performance even worse.

Net of fees, 84.6% of large-cap mutual fund managers lagged the Standard & Poor's 500 index the past 10 years, and 79.58% of large-cap institutional account managers fell behind the blue-chip index as well. If you overlook fees – something investors are increasingly unwilling to do – 68.16% of large-cap mutual funds and 69.20% of institutional accounts underperformed.

Things only get worse for midcap managers: 96.03% of mutual funds and 92.02% of institutional accounts underperformed the S&P MidCap 400® on a net basis. And more than 80% of small-cap managers, both in funds and in institutional accounts, lagged the S&P SmallCap 600 on a net basis.

One bright spot for U.S. stock investors: Large-cap value mutual funds. Only 46.73% underperformed their benchmark on a gross basis. That number rose to 64.49% net of fees.

The odds of beating the benchmark increased for those funds and institutional accounts investing in small-cap international stocks. "While managers outperformed on a gross-of-fees basis in this space, they failed to provide value after fees were accounted for," the report said. "This is to be expected, as access to smaller, less liquid foreign securities can be costly."

Emerging markets, often held up as an area where active management can make a difference, fared miserably. Nearly two-thirds of these managers failed to deliver excess returns compared with the broad-based benchmark.

Results for bond managers were mixed: Institutional managers continued to show strength in U.S. products such as mortgage-backed securities, investment-grade corporate bonds, and global credit, outperforming their respective benchmarks, the report said.

Mutual fund municipal bond managers were hamstrung by fees. About 73% of them failed to outperform the benchmark on a net-of-fees basis, while only 47% underperformed on a gross-of-fees basis. The median annual fee for muni mutual funds was 0.75% per year, whereas the median fee for institutional muni accounts was 0.35%.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video

Events

Carson Group's Schaben: Making sense of millennials

Lazy, entitled, the trophy generation: These are stereotypes most often associated with millennials. But why are these myths and not realities. Carson Group's Aaron Schaben explains.

Video Spotlight

The Search for Income

Sponsored by PGIM Investments

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

T. Rowe Price steps up its game to serve financial advisers

The Baltimore-based mutual fund giant is more aggressively targeting financial advisers with a beefed-up wholesale crew and placement on custodial platforms.

The most important tax changes for 2018

The Internal Revenue Service issued inflation adjustments to more than 50 tax provisions for 2018.

Shift to Roth 401(k)s 'highly likely' part of tax reform: former Treasury official Mark Iwry

Mandated contributions to Roth accounts would likely only be partial, as opposed to having a full repeal of pre-tax accounts.

E*Trade acquiring custodian Trust Company of America

Discount broker buying second-tier custodian for $275 million.

Another thousand Dow points higher, and investors yawn

Market milestones keep falling like dominoes, with 51 records broken so far this year.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print