FSC Securities to pay $592,000 for failure to supervise leveraged ETFs

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. and FSC Securities last Thursday announced that the firm will pay a $100,000 fine and $492,000 to clients

Aug 14, 2017 @ 1:57 pm

By Bruce Kelly

FSC Securities Corp., one of the Advisor Group broker-dealers, is the latest firm to pay significant restitution and fines stemming from problems supervising trades of leveraged, inverse exchange traded funds.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. and FSC Securities last Thursday announced the $100,000 fine and $492,000 payment to clients for FSC's failure to reasonably supervise leveraged ETFs from January 2009 through September 2014.

FSC joins a number of firms that have run into problems with brokers trading of leveraged ETFs, which use leverage to amplify returns of a stock index and are not designed for buy and hold investors. Earlier this year, Morgan Stanley agreed to pay an $8 million penalty and admit wrongdoing to settle charges related to single inverse ETF investments it recommended to advisory clients, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission. And last year, Finra and the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. fined Wedbush Securities Inc. $675,000 for a series of trading and clearing snafus involving a client's redemption activity and trading of leveraged ETFs.

A spokesman for Advisor Group, Jason Lahita, said in an email that, as a matter of company policy, the broker-dealer network does not comment on such matters.

During the five-and-a-half year period, FSC executed close to 6,500 purchases of leveraged, or inverse, non-traditional ETFs in about 1,400 retail client accounts, according to Finra. Those sales were worth close to $92 million and generated $603,000 in commissions.

"However, FSC failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written procedures, reasonably designed to ensure that the firm's offering of non-traditional ETFs complied with NASD and Finra rules," according to Finra. "Non-traditional ETFs have certain risks that are not associated with traditional ETFs or equities. The firm's general supervisory system was not sufficiently tailored to address the unique features and risks involved with these products."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

The bizarro world of DOL and SEC rule supporters

Managing editor Christina Nelson talks with senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. about why groups that supported the Labor Department's fiduciary rule oppose much of the SEC advice package, and vice versa.

Latest news & opinion

10 most affordable U.S. cities for renters

Here are the U.S. cities that are most affordable for renters, according to Business Student.com, which compared the cost of rent to average salaries.

9 best - new - financial adviser jokes

Scroll through for nine new financial adviser laughs.

Captrust, prominent 401(k) advice firm, ramps up its wealth management business

Captrust wants to grow annual revenue from wealth management to 50% from 30% over the next five years.

Fidelity CEO says zero-fee funds aimed at expanding its universe

Johnson says way to prosper in financial services is 'by building relationships.'

SEC advice rule contains a huge hole

Jay Clayton aims to clear up investor confusion by drawing a distinction between brokers and advisers in the agency's proposed package of revised standards. But where do dual registrants fit?

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print