401(k) advisers value active management in some categories, despite indexing craze

Fixed income and emerging markets are areas where active funds make sense, some experts say

Aug 21, 2017 @ 11:30 am

By Bruce Shutan

+ Zoom

Index funds are continuing their push into 401(k) plan menus, but some retirement plan advisers and analysts still see areas where active management makes sense.

The number of 401(k) plans offering index funds to employees swelled to 89.4% of plans in 2014, an increase of 10 percentage points from 2006, according to a joint study conducted last year by the Investment Company Institute and BrightScope Inc. Over that same period, participant assets held in index funds climbed to 29% from 17%.

In 2016, DC plan sponsors increased the presence of passive funds in their plans nearly five times more than active funds (11.9% versus 2.4% of plans) — a trend that's expected to continue in 2017, according to Callan Associates, a consulting firm.

There are several reasons for the shift. For one, funds using an active-management style are often more expensive than funds that track a market index. In an environment of hyper-sensitivity toward fees, due in part to the proliferating excessive-fee litigation targeting plan sponsors, lower-cost funds reap the rewards.

Advisers relying on active funds may also be swimming upstream, since such funds haven't done well demonstrating long-term outperformance.

Robert E. Pike, president and chief investment officer at Stratford Advisors, said hard data "proves that passive wins."

Over the 15-year period ending Dec. 2016, roughly 92% of large-cap, 95% of mid-cap, and 93% of small-cap managers trailed their respective benchmarks, according to the SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active) U.S. Scorecard report.

"The data is stunning," Mr. Pike said.

Whatever the data suggests, though, Mr. Pike believes the overarching issue is how advisers choose to provide market exposure to plan participants.

Retirement plan advisers are primarily using actively managed funds in categories such as fixed income and emerging markets, said Chris Brown, founder and principal of Sway Research, which studies asset management distribution in defined contribution plans. These advisers see any additional fund costs as worthwhile given the funds' potential to outperform the market, he said.

Jamie Greenleaf, principal and lead consultant at Cafaro Greenleaf, which oversees roughly $2.3 billion in DC assets, believes active management can be prudent in all asset classes, but tends to work best in small- and mid-cap markets, as well as international markets associated with higher risks. In contrast, there's not as much value in an actively managed large-cap fund, she said.

A DC plan's investment committee tends to see value in active management when members understand there are trade-offs to their decisions, Ms. Greenleaf said. Her firm uses a 13-item questionnaire to formulate appropriate criteria and weightings. It also shifts the focus from strictly performance or fees to more strategic goals.

Many plan advisers with large defined contribution books of business are addressing the cost stigma of active management by using passive mixes in some domestic stock-blend categories to lower plan expenses, Mr. Brown said.

David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management, warned of caveats to consider when assessing the true value of active management for DC plans. Some sponsors could be sold a false bill of goods.

"A lot of active funds that have higher expense ratios aren't always that active, and so you want to make sure you're actually getting active exposure to the market," Mr. Blanchett said.

But, "the most important alpha is helping clients accomplish their goals," Mr. Blanchett said.

A solid set of investments in a core menu will be meaningless if participants are using them inappropriately, for example.

The indexing trend is certainly pushing advisers to reach beyond their investment prowess in order to demonstrate value to plan sponsors. Specialist advisory firms such as SageView Advisory Group or Captrust, large DC-focused advisory networks managing tens of billions of dollars in plan assets, don't generally tie their worth to investment-management selection as much as they did in the past, Mr. Brown said.

Investment menus are often worked out by the home offices, and advisers tend to follow their recommendations, he said. Rather, these firms' focus is more squarely on plan design, vendor selection, compliance and benchmarking fees against similar sized plans, and boosting participant enrollment and deferral rates.

Bruce Shutan is a Los Angeles freelance writer.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

Consuelo Mack WealthTrack

Why inflation and interest rates could remain low for a very long time

Stephen Smith, co-lead portfolio manager of global fixed income at Brandywine Global, and John Bellows, portfolio manager and research analyst at Western Asset Management, discuss what the outlook for monetary policy means for investors.

Video Spotlight

Are Your Clients Prepared For Market Downturns?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

What not to say to clients when the markets drop

Here's what advisers should steer clear of saying the next time stocks turn downward.

SEC bars former rep for alleged share price manipulation

George Thoreson tried to keep penny stock's price high to enable Nasdaq listing.

Nevada fiduciary law raises concerns among retirement professionals, brokerage industry

Critics complain that it conflicts with ERISA and SEC rules and has potential to spur other states to pass their own version of a fiduciary rule.

A special need for financial advice

Advisers don't have to be experts to help special needs families get a jump on lifelong planning.

Broker-dealers and RIAs at loggerheads over fiduciary rule delay

Companies and groups weighing in with comment letters have vastly different viewpoints on the delay's potential impact.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print