OMB approves proposal for 18-month delay of DOL fiduciary rule's second phase

One observer says agency is trying to give certainty to markets; another asserts it is executing pre-determined course to water down regulation

Aug 29, 2017 @ 1:52 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

The Office of Management and Budget has approved a proposal to delay for 18 months implementation of the remaining provisions in the Labor Department's fiduciary rule.

The OMB made its determination on Monday and posted the decision on its website on Tuesday, taking only a fraction of the 90 days that it could have had to review the proposal, which was submitted by DOL on Aug. 9.

The delay proposal has been sent back to DOL, which is likely to release it soon for a short comment period. After reviewing the input, DOL would file a final delay rule with OMB for approval. Experts say the delay rulemaking process will likely conclude in October. The DOL did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The agency has proposed pushing back the applicability of the enforcement mechanisms in the fiduciary rule from Jan. 1, 2018, to July 1, 2019, while it undertakes a review of the measure mandated by President Donald J. Trump that could lead to revisions.

The OMB acted quickly in order to set a calendar for financial firms that have been wrestling with the rule, said Erin Sweeney, a member at the law firm Miller & Chevalier.

"What the OMB is trying to do is quell the markets to give people some certainty about what the deadlines are," said Ms. Sweeney, a former DOL senior benefit law specialist. "This was done very quickly to take control of the situation."

Micah Hauptman, financial services counsel at the Consumer Federation of America, said that the OMB's decision to approve the delay was "clearly pre-determined" and that rule supporters are ready to parse DOL's economic analysis.

"We'll be looking for the justification of the delay," Mr. Hauptman said. "Is it to allow for more efficient implementation, as the DOL suggested in their request for information, or is it to buy time to water down the rule?"

Advocates say the rule mitigates brokers' conflicts of interest that can lead to inappropriate high-fee investments that erode savings. Critics of the rule say it is too complex and costly and will price clients with modest assets out of the advice market.

Delaying the enforcement provisions will hurt investors, according to Mr. Hauptman.

"Walking away from that raises real concerns," he said.

Fred Reish, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath, said that the 18-month delay would be a reasonable timeout if the DOL coordinates with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which has put out a request for comment that could lead to its own fiduciary rule, as well as Finra, the broker-dealer regulator, and state insurance commissioners.

"That's a time-consuming process to work with each of those groups," Mr. Reish said. "The rules will never end up being identical. But I do think they can be made more compatible."

Two provisions of the DOL rule, which would require all financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in retirement accounts, were implemented in June. The remaining parts include the so-called best-interest contract exemption that allows brokers to charge variable compensation for products as long as they sign a legally binding agreement to put their clients' interests ahead of their own. The 18-month delay would apply to the BICE as well as exemptions for principal transactions and for insurance agents and brokers.

For now, some mystery surrounds OMB's delay approval, which OMB said was "consistent with change." The answer to that cryptic note might come when DOL releases the proposal.

"None of this is totally clear," said Aron Szapiro, director of policy research at Morningstar Inc. "What happened today is one more step in the process. Soon we'll have the actual [regulatory] notice and will understand what this means."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 30


Adviser Compensation & Staffing Workshop

The InvestmentNews Research team will present exclusive data and highlights from its bellwether benchmarking study that will identify best practices for setting and structuring compensation and benefits packages throughout your... Learn more

Featured video


Cameras roll at Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers' awards

Advisory firm winners on the top 50 InvestmentNews list of Best Places to Work for Financial Advisers explain the significance of this recognition at the Chicago awards event.

Latest news & opinion

Supreme Court decision likely to prevent brokers from filing class-action lawsuits

However, it likely won't bar employees from filing 401(k) lawsuits against their employers.

5th Circuit denies states' second attempt to defend DOL fiduciary rule

The three-judge panel split again, 2-1, in deciding not to take another look at the motion to intervene by California, New York and Oregon.

Pass-through tax strategies for business-owner clients

Shifting business structure, changing filing status and spinning off equipment are examples of ways business owners can take advantage of the deduction.

Finra anticipates oversight role for SEC advice rule

CEO Robert Cook says one area for examination could be the proposed requirement that brokers act in the best interests of their clients.

IBDs with the most CFPs

Here are the 10 independent broker-dealers that employ the most certified financial planner professionals.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print