State-registered advisers face fee model inconsistencies

Methods for charging client fees OK in some states, not others

Aug 30, 2017 @ 5:14 pm

By Liz Skinner

+ Zoom
(Getty Images/iStockphoto)

New financial advisers are finding strange discrepancies between states in terms of the way regulators are allowing them to charge their clients fees for services.

They have found that some states will not allow them to charge a client both a fee based on assets under management and a flat fee, even though they will allow firms to charge clients one or the other. Other states, such as Utah, tell advisers that fees based on net worth are not acceptable, said Michael Kitces, partner and director of research at Pinnacle Advisory Group Inc. and co-founder of the XY Planning Network, which is holding its third annual conference in Dallas this week.

"We are seeing huge disparities in how states interpret 'unethical business practice' rules when advisers register their firms," he said in an interview.

XYPN, a network of fee-only advisers aimed at serving Generation X and Y clients, helps new firms file their registration documents with state securities regulators, which oversee firms with less than $100 million in assets under management. The 489-member network has helped more than 200 firms register their advice businesses with states in the past three years.

(More: Adviser explains why and how to move to a retainer model)

Utah regulators had an issue with charging clients a fee based on the person's net worth because it would charge one client more than another for seemingly the same services, said Alan Moore, XYPN co-founder, who traveled to Utah to meet personally with regulators there.

They also told him that fees based on client income or complexity of the client's financial situation would not be allowed.

The state publicly has said hourly fees that vary or can be negotiated could be seen as unreasonable, and fees that are nonrefundable or are paid just for the adviser's availability may be not be allowed.

In other states, regulators rejected a firm's plan to charge clients a monthly fee based on AUM and a one-time planning fee.

"The state said the firm can do all of either, but they felt like it was double dipping if they charged both," Mr. Kitces said.

(More: TD's Nally urges evolution of RIA fee model)

Multiple state regulators also have questioned whether charges above $150 a hour can be considered reasonable compensation for a fee-only adviser, even though some AUM-based advisers could generate two or three times the revenue per hour, Mr. Kitces said.

The network's leaders are encouraging the North American Securities Administrators Association to develop a model rule to help alleviate the differences. States would still individually have to adopt any such rule.

"State regulators have a strong interest in investor protection, and that includes ensuring that fees are fair and for services that provide value," said Bob Webster, NASAA spokesman.

The association is aware that states at time take different positions on fees. However, that could also reflect different services provided by investment advisers in various states, he said.

In the case of a firm charging clients two different fees, states are generally resistant to this approach, Mr Webster said.

NASAA hasn't had complaints from advisers about fee model approvals, but it's open to exploring it further, he said.

About 96% of RIAs assess fees based on how much assets they're managing, according to the InvestmentNews 2016 Financial Performance Study. The survey allowed selection of multiple pay models, and about 44% said they set prices based on flat or tiered-dollar fees, 28% have hourly fees and 26% have a per-project fee, the study found.

Increasingly, RIAs are moving to fee models not based on AUM in an effort to better reflect the planning and other financial help they provide instead of focusing only on investments they manage.

Retainer fees often allow advisers to work with younger clients and those without large amounts of assets.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Does your pay stack up?

The Adviser Research Dashboard

Based on data collected through InvestmentNews' annual adviser research studies, this interactive, customizable tool allows you to view detailed data on compensation, staffing and financial performance practices from across the industry.

Learn more »

Upcoming Event

Oct 17

Conference

Best Practices Workshop

For the fifth year, InvestmentNews will host the Best Practices Workshop & Awards, bringing together the industry’s top-performing and most influential firms in one room for a full-day. This exclusive workshop and awards program for the... Learn more

Featured video

Events

Beyond coding: Behind the scenes of Fuse 2017

Fuse is a one-of-a-kind event where developers from various fintech firms come together and work towards a common goal. Although the nights are long, a ton of innovation comes out of the event, as everyone has a bit of fun along the way.

Video Spotlight

Are Your Clients Prepared For Market Downturns?

Sponsored by Prudential

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Video Spotlight

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

What not to say to clients when the markets drop

Here's what advisers should steer clear of saying the next time stocks turn downward.

SEC bars former rep for alleged share price manipulation

George Thoreson tried to keep penny stock's price high to enable Nasdaq listing.

Nevada fiduciary law raises concerns among retirement professionals, brokerage industry

Critics complain that it conflicts with ERISA and SEC rules and has potential to spur other states to pass their own version of a fiduciary rule.

A special need for financial advice

Advisers don't have to be experts to help special needs families get a jump on lifelong planning.

Broker-dealers and RIAs at loggerheads over fiduciary rule delay

Companies and groups weighing in with comment letters have vastly different viewpoints on the delay's potential impact.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print