Trump administration targets class-action right in DOL fiduciary rule, but other legal avenues could remain for investors

If the best-interest contract remains in some form, action could switch to state courts; Finra still allows class actions

Aug 31, 2017 @ 5:08 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Even before the Labor Department has finished its review of its fiduciary rule, the Trump administration has made clear that it is targeting a part of the measure that would make it easier for investors to pursue class-action lawsuits against financial advisers.

The latest evidence is a DOL Field Assistance Bulletin released on Wednesday, that said that the agency would not bring enforcement actions against advisers relying on exemptions in the measure if they include class-action bans in retirement account contracts.

The bulletin, which mentions that the Trump administration is no longer opposing class-action bans in a Supreme Court case, comes shortly after the DOL said in a brief for a lawsuit against the fiduciary rule that the class-action provision would "likely be mooted in the near future."

The class-action provision is part of the best interest contract exemption that would allow brokers to receive variable compensation for investment products they put in individual retirement accounts as long as they sign the legally binding agreement to act in their clients' best interests. Also on Wednesday, the DOL released a proposal to delay implementation of the contract and two other exemptions from Jan. 1, 2018, to July 1, 2019.

It's not clear how much of the rule the DOL is going to change under a directive from President Donald J. Trump to reassess the rule. If the best-interest contract survives in some form, financial firms could still face significant liability risk.

Joshua Lichtenstein, an associate at the law firm Ropes & Gray, noticed this line in the preamble of the delay proposal: "IRA owners, who do not have statutory enforcement rights under ERISA [the federal retirement law] would be able to enforce their contractual rights under state law."

Although the Trump administration may not want investors banding together in a legal action, it might not be opposed to state cases.

"It seems like a clear intent to shift the enforcement mechanism away from class-action lawsuits toward state-law breach of contract claims," Mr. Lichtenstein said. "The actionable claims could differ from state-to-state. That could mean some behavior is a breach of fiduciary duty to an IRA in one state but not in another."

When it comes to class actions, the Financial Regulatory Authority Inc., the broker-dealer self regulator, still looms. In Finra arbitration, class action waivers are banned. Presumably, a group of retirement investors who think their broker has committed a fiduciary violation would be able to pursue a class-action through the Finra system.

"Finra views [allowing class actions] as a reasonable step to protect investors," said George Friedman, an adjunct law professor at Fordham University and a former Finra director of arbitration. "I don't see the delay in the DOL rule having any effect on their thinking."

The DOL's decision not to enforce class-action waivers is still significant because the fiduciary rule would make IRA class actions possible, according to Marcia Wagner, managing director of The Wagner Law Group.

"You very, very infrequently see class actions with IRAs, and if this is the position of the administration, that will continue," Ms. Wagner said. "It may be a signal that when this regulation is modified there won't be a private right of action for class action lawsuits as part of the exemption."

It's almost a certainty that class-actions will drop out of the DOL fiduciary rule. The question is how much of its legal bite will remain.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print