Subscribe

Edison International agrees to pay $13.2 million in 401(k) fee lawsuit

The monetary agreement follows a court ruling last month.

Parties in the landmark Tibble v. Edison lawsuit have agreed the defendant, Edison International, will pay more than $13 million in damages to cover allegations of excessive 401(k) fees.

After 10 years of litigation, which included a trip to the Supreme Court, a California judge last month laid to rest the remaining points of contention by ruling in favor of plaintiffs, who alleged fiduciaries of the Edison 401(k) plan selected high-cost retail shares of investment funds as opposed to lower-cost institutional shares.

The August ruling didn’t include a complete set of damages. The parties had agreed to $7.54 million in damages for the period from 2001 to January 2011, when the 17 higher-cost funds in question were present in the roughly $4 billion 401(k) plan.

But, damages for the remaining period, February 2011 to the present, were absent. Parties submitted a joint stipulation Sep. 5 in California district court saying “opportunity loss damages” amounted to $5.62 million for that time period.

(More: Tibble v. Edison 401(k) fee-case decision offers 3 lessons)

The Tibble suit is only the second case of its kind to have received judgment following a trial. These cases often settle before trial, the largest settlement being $140 million.

Judge Stephen V. Wilson said in a Sep. 5 order the calculation “accurately” states the plan’s total losses resulting from breach of fiduciary duty. He said the court will separately determine any fees, cost and expenses defendants will pay to plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Plaintiffs are represented by Jerome Schlichter of Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, a pioneer of 401(k) excessive fee suits.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

SEC issues FAQs on investment advice rule

The agency published answers to four questions about Form CRS.

SEC proposes tougher sales rule for exchange-traded products

The agency, concerned about consumer protection, says clients need a baseline understanding of product risk

Pete Buttigieg proposes a ‘public’ 401(k) program

The proposal is similar to others seeking to improve access to workplace retirement plans but would require an employer match.

DOL digital 401(k) rule not digital enough, industry says

Some stakeholders say the disclosure proposal is still paper-centric and should take into account newer technologies.

Five brokers lose Ohio National lawsuit over annuity commissions

Judge rules the brokers weren't beneficiaries of the selling agreement between the insurer and broker-dealers.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print