Retirement 2.0blog

Retirement-income theories confront reality

Latest robo-adviser challenges rule-of-thumb approaches

Sep 12, 2017 @ 4:09 pm

By Mary Beth Franklin

I spent part of my post-Labor Day week at the beach catching up on my professional reading. I knocked off eight issues of the Journal of Financial Planning and scored eight hours of continuing education credits by taking the online quizzes available for each issue.

There is something very satisfying about being able to devote long stretches of time to reviewing the latest research, analysis and opinions — particularly when accompanied by a cool beverage on a hot day. Bonus points for the sound of breaking waves in the background. What struck me the most is how financial planning continues to be more art than science, particularly when it comes to retirement-income distributions.

More than two decades ago, William Bengen developed the 4% rule, which evolved into the holy grail of safe initial withdrawal rates for retirees — until persistent low interest rates called even that conservative rule of thumb into question.

Mr. Bengen's model suggested that if retirees restricted their initial withdrawal to 4% of their nest egg during the first year of retirement and adjusted the dollar amount of those withdrawals for inflation each year, savings should last 30 years, assuming historic averages for a balanced portfolio.

"Most models assume the retiree makes all spending and investment decisions only at retirement and then follows the strategy, without adjustment, until death," David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar, pointed out in his article in April 2017 issue of the Journal of Financial Planning. "In reality, a retiree whose portfolio is headed toward ruin would likely reduced withdrawals in an attempt to prolong its sustainability," Mr. Blanchett wrote.

Wade Pfau, a professor of retirement income at The American College and a principal at McLean Asset Management, explored two competing philosophies about building a retirement-income plan: Whether retirees should place their trust in the risks and rewards of a stock portfolio or the contractual guarantee of income annuities.

In the February 2017 issue of the FPA Journal, Mr. Pfau concluded: "For risk-adverse retirees, risk pooling funded retirement spending goals more cheaply and with contractual guarantees which in turn allows for greater true liquidity for non-annuitized investment assets." In contrast, "The main advantage for the investment-only risk premium strategy was it allowed for a larger legacy should the retiree die early."

What's the take away? "These trade-offs suggest that greater care should be taken by advisers and retirees when considering how a client's risk aversion and desires for legacy impact the relative advantages of risk pooling and the risk-premium strategies to fund retirement spending goals," Mr. Pfau wrote.

Jonathan Guyton, a principal of Cornerstone Wealth Advisors Inc., tackled the concept of dividing retirement spending into "essential" and "discretionary" categories, using guaranteed sources of income, such as Social Security, pensions and perhaps an income annuity to cover ongoing living expenses and earmarking remaining financial assets for discretionary expenses.

"The essential-versus-discretionary strategy would work flawlessly if people where spreadsheets and not human beings," Mr. Guyton pointed out in the April 2017 issue of the Journal of Financial Planning. "But whatever they're called, one of the most important things our retired clients have taught me is that far more of their expenses when retirement begins fit the 'discretionary' definition than I initially realized."

Contrary to retirement-income theories based on maintaining the same level of spending throughout retirement, actual spending may be higher initially during the "go-go" years and diminish as clients enter their "slow-go" and "no-go" years, with the possibility of a spike in health-care costs near the end of life. Assuming the same level of spending throughout a 30-year retirement could result in overly conservative annual withdrawals, denying clients from enjoying some of the fruits of a well-deserved retirement.

Matt Fellowes, founder of the newly launched United Income robo-adviser, believes he has the answer: big data.

"With technology and data today, we can do a much better job managing money," Mr. Fellowes told me in an interview. "We can replace generic assumptions with personalized information."

Deploying huge data sets on investment performance, retiree spending, longevity and other crucial factors to simulate millions of outcomes, the United Income software estimates the chances that each client's personalized retirement strategy will actually succeed, then refines the plan if it won't. Its retirement paycheck feature aggregates a client's varied income sources into a monthly disbursement and reviews the appropriate amount every six months.

Rather than fear the entry of new robo-adviser into the retirement-income space, advisers might take a fresh look at how United Income earmarks separate investment strategies to fund specific retirement spending goals such as a dream cruise, a grandchild's college fund or potential long-term care expenses. "It beats hands down other retirement-income solutions that treat retirement liability as a lump sum with a single investment strategy," Mr. Fellowes said.

Technology may improve retirement-income projections, but it will never replace the human touch of an adviser who listens to a client's hopes and fears and constructs a plan to address both.

(Questions about new Social Security rules? Find the answers in my new ebook.)

Mary Beth Franklin is a contributing editor to InvestmentNews and a certified financial planner.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

May 02


Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

8 apps advisers love for getting stuff done

Smartphone apps that advisers are using in 2018 to run their business more efficiently.

Galvin's DOL fiduciary rule enforcement triggers industry plea for court decision

Plaintiffs warned the Fifth Circuit that Massachusetts' move against Scottrade signaled that the partially implemented regulation can raise costs for financial firms.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print