The Limitless Adviser

Stephanie Bogan explores the fact that our success is defined more by what is happening inside of us than by external circumstances, and breaks through advisers' self-imposed limitations.

Time to change the conversation on fees, referrals

A couple sample encounters show advisers how to stick firm to pricing and get the best prospect recommendations

Sep 19, 2017 @ 2:55 pm

By Stephanie Bogan

It's time to change the conversations we hold with ourselves, and the ones we have with clients.

Your brain, specifically your limbic system, is hard-wired for survival rather than success. So when confronted with a challenging request, our brains go on the defensive and remove us from the conflict zone as quickly as possible. The problem is, we've limited ourselves, and our practices, in the process.

For example, how often have you found yourself meeting with a prospect, explaining how you can help, and the prospect asks for a discount on the fees. The prospect is saying, "I want what you offer, I just don't value it the way that you do. Would you please still work with me?"

(More Stephanie Bogan: How to ask for the fees you deserve)

What if, instead of simply answering yes or no, you instead reframe the conversation and say: "That's a question we get from time to time. Over the years we've learned that our fees aren't the least or most expensive out there. We are committed to adding immense value to our clients. Doing this requires that we have the people and resources we need to deliver. Our fees are set based on professional norms, the cost of running a successful business and ensuring that we're rewarded fairly for the value we provide. Fees aren't something we compromise, just as we would never ask you to let us compromise the value we deliver. If our fees don't fit with your needs, we completely understand. That said, we'd love to work with you if you're ready to move forward."

The same holds true for taking an inappropriate referral. Our brains tell us that if you say yes, you get a client and keep a referral source. If you say no, you'll lose both.

But is that really true?

Let's imagine that you call the local professional who referred the prospect and say: "Bob, I got a call from Jane Smith. I just want to say how touched I am by your confidence in making this referral. I always work to ensure your clients know you're really looking out for them by making sure all of their needs are met. I'll look forward to meeting with Jane and will keep you posted."

Then you meet with Jane, only to discover that she doesn't meet your minimums. What do you do? Does your ADV say: we take all clients, regardless of size, needs or ability to pay fairly for the work we do?

(More Limitless Adviser: Managing client expectations is a big part of an adviser's job)

Instead, let's suppose you say: "Jane, I can see why John referred you to us. With your needs and goals, you can really benefit from financial advice. John has done you a great service. However, in this case, you don't really need the depth and breadth of the services we offer. My firm could help you, but honestly your needs don't justify our level of expertise and I would not feel good about charging you our fees. The best way I can help you is to refer you to another adviser who focuses on working with clients like you. If you'd like, I'd be happy to make an introduction to a qualified adviser who's right for you."

Then, you call John and say something like: "John, I met with Jane, and you were right; she's a lovely person and really does have some needs. In meeting with her, I realized I've not done a good job of sharing with you who we do our best work with: business owners with complex situations who really need the expertise we've developed. We could work with Jane, but the fees we'd have to charge her wouldn't be fair and I just wouldn't feel right about it. I'm putting her in touch with a younger adviser who can better meet her needs, and I'll stay in touch to make sure she's well served. Of course, I'd love for you to keep sending me people to help. If they're a smaller client I'm happy to help them find an adviser that's a good fit, and if they have more complex needs we'd of course be happy to work with them directly. What's important to me is that you keep having this conversation with your clients, because I believe it's so important."

(More Limitless Adviser: Cast off limitations with '5 Freedoms')

What just happened? You've helped Jane in the way that's best for her without compromising what's best for you. You've demonstrated — to both John and Jane — that you're not one of those salespeople types, but rather a highly ethical and credible professional. Third, you've used this as a training opportunity with your referral source.

Changing the conversation changes everything.

Stephanie Bogan is the CEO of Educe Inc. and has spent 20 years helping advisers unleash their potential to build successful firms and lives they love. Contact her at stephanie.bogan@educeinc.com, or visit limitlessadviser.com to receive her white paper The 5 Freedoms of Limitless Advisers.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 02

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

Events

Why does social media matter for financial advisers?

Social media is a reflection of who you are. But who are you as a financial adviser? Debra Bednar Clark of DB+co offers some solutions to enhance your practice.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.

House and Senate reach tentative compromise for tax overhaul

Lawmakers still need to get a cost analysis of their agreement, so it's not yet definite, according to a source.

Advisers' biggest fears for 2018

What keeps advisers up at night.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print