Massachusetts blasts SII over nontraded REIT sales

Securities regulator says SII Investments failed to supervise agents over suitability

Sep 20, 2017 @ 3:07 pm

By InvestmentNews

Massachusetts regulators have charged SII Investments with "dishonest or unethical conduct and failure to supervise" sales of non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) to investors by inflating clients' liquid net worth.

In doing so, William Galvin, the secretary of the commonwealth, said the firm violated its own internal policies and procedures.

SII is an independent broker-dealer within National Planning Holdings, which is being acquired by by LPL Financial. National Planning Holdings could not be reached for comment. In a statement, LPL said, "Under the construct of our agreement, LPL would not be liable for this matter."

A Massachusetts securities regulation requires that an investor's purchase of a particular non-traded REIT issue can constitute no more than 10% of the investor's liquid net worth. The administrative complaint against SII charges that the brokerage firm sold more than $4 million of non-traded REITs, many of which would have been in violation of Massachusetts limitations as well as SII's own compliance requirements and prospectus mandates, while the firm and its agents received high commissions.

The complaint alleges that SII agents improperly calculated Massachusetts clients' liquid net worth on suitability and disclosure forms for non-traded REITs, while SII's compliance team failed to supervise the agents selling the inappropriate investments.

The state said that while SII's own internal policies make clear that annuities are illiquid products, "SII nevertheless included annuities with material pending surrender fees as liquid for non-traded REIT liquid net worth calculations." Had these products not been included, the state said, many of the sales of nontraded REITs could not have occurred.

The complaint seeks censure, a cease and desist order, and restitution for those investors whose losses were attributable to the alleged wrongdoing. Also sought is an administrative fine.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Why integration is essential (and how it works)

Integration has been one of the biggest fintech themes in 2017. But why (and how) does this work? Matt Brown of CAIS and Sean Mullen of Advice Period explain.

Video Spotlight

Help Clients Be Prepared, Not Surprised

Sponsored by Prudential

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

RIAs struggle to keep clients grounded amid stock market euphoria

With equities at record levels, financial advisers are confronted with realities of greed and fear.

Tax update: Brady says sales tax deduction in final bill

Taxpayers will be able to deduct state income taxes or state sales taxes in addition to property levies — up to a $10,000 cap.

Complexity of new indexed annuities causing concern

Insurers are using 'hybrid' indices as a way to differentiate themselves, but critics contend the products are less transparent, more confusing and don't add financial benefit.

Critics say regulation hasn't curbed overly rosy projections for indexed universal life insurance

They say rule didn't go far enough and more stringent measures may be necessary.

Broker, retirement groups make last-minute pleas to change tax legislation

Pass-through provisions are target of groups representing employee-model brokerage firms, as well as retirement plan advisers.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print