SEC charges barred broker with masterminding $6 million real estate scam

Leonard Vincent Lombardo, who has been barred from the securities industry by Finra for about 20 years, allegedly defrauded 100 investors

Sep 29, 2017 @ 5:18 pm

By InvestmentNews

The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged former broker Leonard Vincent Lombardo, his company and his business partner in an alleged real estate investment scheme that took $6 million from retirees and other investors.

The SEC alleges that Leonard Vincent Lombardo, who has been barred from the securities industry by Finra for about 20 years, operated the scheme from behind the scenes at his Long Island-based company, The Leonard Vincent Group, with assistance from its CFO Brian Hudlin. Mr. Lombardo once worked at Stratton Oakmont, which was expelled by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in 1998.

(More: SEC charges adviser with stealing from clients, committing identity fraud on elderly)

According to the SEC's complaint, more than 100 investors were defrauded with false claims that their money would be invested in distressed real estate, and some were told their investments had increased by more than 50% in a matter of months when in fact there were no actual earnings on their investments. Mr. Lombardo allegedly invested only a small fraction of the investor money in real estate and used the bulk of it for separate business ventures in the cigarette industry and personal expenses such as car payments, marina fees and visits to tanning salons.

The SEC said it received complaints from investors about how their investments were being handled, and the agency identified the perpetrators and gathered evidence to hold them accountable.

(More: Lynn Tilton wins SEC fraud trial)

The Leonard Vincent Group and Messrs. Lombardo and Hudlin have agreed to settlements that are subject to court approval.

Mr. Lombardo and his firm agreed to pay disgorgement of $5.88 million. He also pled guilty in a parallel criminal case brought by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.

Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Mr. Hudlin agreed to pay a $40,000 penalty.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


What's the top issue on advisers minds?

Laura Pierson from Carson Group discusses how the old topic of 'Human Capital' is hot again because of millennials.

Latest news & opinion

New ways to pay for college

Experts respond to real-life scenarios of people struggling to afford higher education.

How technology is reshaping the advice business

Artificial intelligence, Amazon and robo-advisers are some of the topics on the minds of tech experts.

Best- and worst-performing sector funds and ETFs this year

A rising tide may lift all ships, but a bull market doesn't lift all stock sectors. Here are the best- and worst-performing sectors this year, with the top and bottom fund in each sector.

Betterment slapped with $400,000 fine from Finra

Robo-adviser cited for violating customer protection rule and not maintaining its books and records correctly.

Supreme Court ruling on SEC judges unlikely to upend advice industry

But it could give rise to new hearings for some advisers who are already in litigation with the agency such as Dawn Bennett.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print