Take 5: Tom Giachetti brings humor, insight to regulatory guidance

The regulatory attorney and chairman of the Securities Practice Group gave a typically candid speech about SEC exams at the Raymond James Wealth Managers Conference

Oct 3, 2017 @ 12:09 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

If in some alternate universe there were ever a comedy club for financial regulatory wonks, Tom Giachetti could headline the show seven nights a week.

Most of his presentations, of which there are many, begin with him warning the audience that his language can get "salty," which is followed in perfect tempo with the confession that if you are offended by his language, "I don't give a [bleep]."

The seasoned regulatory attorney, author and candid commentator, is chairman of the Securities Practice Group, which he says is dedicated first and foremost to helping financial advisers get through an exam by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

"I care about one thing, and that's getting you through an exam; the rest of it is crap," he told an audience of advisers Monday in Boca Raton, Fla., where he was speaking as part of the Raymond James Wealth Managers Conference.

(More: SEC Chairman Jay Clayton doesn't intend to pursue third-party RIA exams.)

While there are mountains of lawyers working to help guide financial advisers through the increasingly complex regulatory framework, few do it with the expressive and public frankness of Mr. Giachetti. Pulling punches is never an option, especially when his target is a regulatory body.

In addition to warning audiences about his salty language, he also invites any regulators in attendance to have a seat up front, "because you might learn something." He has no patience for industry jargon, especially when it comes to communicating with clients.

"There's no such thing as assets under advisement, so get rid of that term," he said. On back-tested performance, he said, "Stop using these sexy stupid things. Just talk to your clients."

We caught up with Mr. Giachetti as he was fresh off the stage in Boca and hankering for a bourbon.

InvestmentNews: Why do you think the SEC so aggressively pursues registered investment advisers?

Tom Giachetti: Because they don't value the expertise that an investment adviser brings to his clients. They look at robo-advisers and Vanguard, and don't understand why an investment adviser charges a multiple of that to provide advisory services.

What they don't appreciate is, what an investment adviser does. He or she sells discipline; making sure clients don't make stupid mistakes.

It is a disgrace that the SEC is looking at portfolios and turnover and making a determination based upon that, that an adviser is not fulfilling his or her obligation, and/or are worth his or her advisory fee.

That is not the purview of the government.

IN: What is the best way to get through an SEC audit?

TG: Hire me. (He chuckles) It's true. Go through an exam. Make sure you understand how to answer every single question. Then hire me.

IN: What is the biggest mistake an adviser can make regarding SEC oversight.

TG: They didn't hire me. (More chuckles) No, no, no. I'm kidding. The biggest mistake would be drinking the Kool-Aid. By that I mean, thinking that the SEC is only concerned about Johnny and Suzie's transactions, and best execution, and not understanding the issues that they're looking at. They are getting into the weeds, because they don't want to leave your office unless they can find some way for you to write a check to somebody.

IN: What are the best and worst parts of the Department of Labor's fiduciary rule?

TG: The best part is it's been postponed to July 2019. The worst part is, the knuckleheads who devised it, who have no clue about the industries that they're regulating.

(More: DOL fiduciary rule: Challenges for RIAs under the BICE.)

IN: What's wrong with financial advisers using social media as a marketing strategy?

TG: Well, nothing except what's crazy to me is that firms will hire marketing consultants, most of whom haven't got a clue about the business. And they will spend an exorbitant amount of money on a marketing campaign, but they won't spend an hour to pay me to review the proposed material to make sure that they can actually use this stuff. They are being guided by marketing consultants thinking that social media is the be all and end all. I promise you, that if you add up all the people who actually look for an investment adviser on Facebook, they'd have a $1.98 to their name.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13



InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video


When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print