Finra denies WSJ report that regulator has underperforming portfolio

Regulator says Journal's analysis makes improper comparison of returns

Oct 6, 2017 @ 1:33 pm

By InvestmentNews

A spokeswoman for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority denies that its investment portfolio has underperformed relevant benchmarks, as a recent Wall Street Journal article asserts.

"The portfolio has exceeded Finra's benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis," spokeswoman Nancy Condon told InvestmentNews today in response to the Journal report.

"In 2009, after the financial crisis, Finra decided to reallocate its assets to pursue a more conservative approach, with the majority of the portfolio invested in fixed income securities. Instead of comparing Finra's returns against a similar asset mix, the Journal's analysis compares Finra's returns to a much more aggressive asset mix of 50% equities and 50% fixed income securities. That is a flawed comparison."

From Finra's origins in 2004 through 2016, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's actively managed $1.6 billion investment portfolio has returned 3.4%, or $440 million less than a 6% return had the self-regulator invested in a balanced mix of global stocks and U.S. bonds, according to Wall Street Journal calculations of figures in Finra's annual reports.

The returns have bottom-line ramifications for the brokerage industry, the Journal reports, noting that higher portfolio returns could have translated into lower costs for Finra's 3,800 member firms, which support the organization's $1 billion budget.

(More: Finra: Who's watching the watchdog?)

When Finra's revenue from fees, fines and investment returns exceeds forecasts, the regulator may rebate fees to the member firms it regulates. The regulator has not rebated such fees since 2014. Instead, since opening its portfolio, Finra has increased certain fees, partly because revenue has come under pressure as its membership declined from 4,600 firms in 2010.

Finra's managed portfolio — which the Journal said is unusual for regulators, since such entities normally invest in short-term securities — goes back to money received in 2001 after the National Association of Securities Dealers, the previous incarnation of the regulator, unloaded its stake in Nasdaq.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Featured video


What's the first thing advisers should do when they get home from a conference?

After attending a financial services conference, advisers can be overwhelmed by options, choices and tools. What's the first thing they should do when they get back to their office?

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print