Subscribe

Use of auto enrollment leaps, survey finds

Target-date funds are the most popular qualified default investment alternative.

Auto enrollment surged in popularity among defined contribution plan sponsors, with 68% using this plan design in 2017, according to a survey by Alight Solutions published Tuesday.

“This was a surprise,” Robert Austin, the Charlotte, N.C.-based director of research for Alight Solutions, said in an interview. “We thought we were at a saturation point.”

Alight conducts a survey of plan sponsors — both clients and non-clients — every two years. In each of the previous four surveys, the adoption rate of auto enrollment hovered between 56% and 59% of respondents. By contrast, in 2007, only 34% of plans offered auto enrollment.

(More: Thank Richard Thaler for that bigger nest egg.)

“Companies are saying ‘Why aren’t we doing this?’” said Mr. Austin, noting plan managers and corporate executives seem to be overcoming fears that employees might push back against automatic enrollment. As these executives see what their peers are doing, he added, they are becoming more amenable to offering auto-enrollment.

However, auto enrollment remains overwhelmingly an option offered only to new employees — 88% of plans offering auto-enrollment in the latest survey use this approach.

TDF POPULARITY

Target-date funds are the most popular qualified default investment alternative offered to auto-enrolled participants. This year, 83% of plans that use auto enrollment used this investment option as the QDIA, well ahead of second-place target-risk funds, at 9%.

Mr. Austin said he was encouraged by the steady rise in higher default contribution rates offered by plans with auto-enrollment, reflecting a realization that participants often need to be nudged to save more. Plans auto-enrolling participants at 6% of annual pay have climbed to 30% in the latest survey representing a five-fold increase from 2007.

The traditional default rate of 3% of annual pay is still offered by 37% of plans, but that is well down from the 51% in 2007.

(More: When automatic enrollment doesn’t make sense for 401(k) plans.)

The Alight Solutions survey also found that plans offering auto enrollment and/or auto escalation are raising their auto features targets. This year, for example, 56% of these plans set a target to 10% of annual pay to be subject to auto features. In 2007, only 14% of plans had this 10% auto features pay target.

The next highest auto features target last year was 6% of annual pay, which was set by 22% of plans vs. 47% of plans with this target in 2007.

The third largest auto features target this year was 15% of annual pay, which was set by 10% of plans.

The latest survey covered 333 plan sponsors with aggregate assets of $775 billion in assets and nearly 10 million participants. The online survey was conducted in the spring.

Robert Steyer is a reporter at InvestmentNews’ sister publication Pensions & Investments.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Appeals court upholds dismissal of Wells Fargo 401(k) lawsuit

Participant argued that the plan could have offered a better-performing, nonproprietary TDF.

Appeals court says university cannot force ERISA lawsuits into arbitration

Decision involves two lawsuits related to University of Southern California retirement plans.

Judge dismisses suit against AT&T plan

Plaintiffs given until July 30 to file amended complaint against executives of the $38.6 billion plan.

New focus on workers who don’t take a full match

Persistent percentage of defined contribution plan participants contribute below the employer match threshhold.

Judge dismisses amended complaint in Wells Fargo stock-drop case

Suit involved decline in price of company stock held in the 401(k) plan after regulators fined Wells.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print