Did Morgan Stanley just kill the broker protocol agreement?

A leading compliance expert says firm's decision significantly ups chances of others following suit.

Oct 31, 2017 @ 5:05 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

Morgan Stanley's decision to walk away from the brokerage industry's protocol agreement "overnight, increased the risk of other brokerage firms likely pulling out of the agreement," said Brian Hamburger, chief executive of compliance consulting firm MarketCounsel.

"It's been under stress for quite some time," said Mr. Hamburger. "I liken it to the time when the first airline decided to start charging for luggage. In the face of competitive change, firms can move quickly."

Morgan Stanley brokers were told in an email on Monday that the firm would enforce client confidentiality and non-solicitation agreements. The new policy goes into effect Friday.

"With our exit from the protocol, advisers are subject to the terms of any applicable client non-solicitation restrictions and/or confidentiality obligations, including restrictions on removing client-related information," the company stated in the email. "The provisions of the protocol that permit advisers to take certain client data and solicit clients when transitioning from one protocol firm to another will no longer apply."

Morgan's decision will be particularly disruptive for teams already in transition, said Mr. Hamburger, speaking Tuesday at the T3 Technology Conference in Las Vegas.

The protocol for broker recruiting was established in 2004 when three firms agreed to what Mr. Hamburger described as a "cease-fire," by providing a universal set of rules for brokers to follow when leaving one protocol firm and joining another.

(More: Morgan Stanley is waving the white flag on recruiting)

The original agreement, which was just three pages long, failed to define exactly what types of firms could participate, leading to a list of more than 1,700 firms now participating, most of which are not brokers, Mr. Hamburger said.

Prior to the protocol agreement, brokerage firms would regularly take advisers to court when they left, often making it difficult for clients to trade in their own accounts.

"The basic document that created protocol says 'you can take our people and we can take your people as long as you follow some requirements," he said.

The simplicity of the original rule also led to firms trying to introduce specific carve-out exceptions, which Mr. Hamburger said have largely not stood up to legal challenges.

Part of Morgan Stanley's statement yesterday cited that "over time, the protocol has become replete with opportunities for gamesmanship and loopholes."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

B-D Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' B-D Data Center to find exclusive information and intelligence about the independent broker-dealer industry.

Rank Broker-dealers by

Featured video

Events

Behind the scenes at Pershing Insite 2018

What goes on behind the scenes at one of the industry's biggest conferences? Join us for an all-access sneak peek!

Latest news & opinion

It's official: DOL fiduciary rule is dead

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate Thursday making its March 15 decision to strike down the regulation effective.

Supreme Court curbs SEC administrative law judges

'Buckets of Money' adviser Raymond Lucia is entitled to a new hearing, court rules.

Opaque, outdated 401(k) plan disclosures harming investors, advisers

Morningstar report: Lack of data on fees, investments makes advice on rollovers costlier and more challenging for investors.

Mutual funds feel the pinch of platform fees

No-transaction-fee options are a big hit with investors, but funds wind up paying the costs — and passing them on.

Divorce reduces retirement readiness

The new tax law could increase financial challenges for divorced people, but planning opportunities abound.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print