Trump administration seeks to give boost to 401(k) annuities

A Treasury proposal seeks to amend rules for plan sponsors to help them assess the long-term viability of insurance companies

Oct 31, 2017 @ 2:00 pm

By Greg Iacurci

The Trump administration wants to give a shot in the arm to annuities in 401(k) plans by encouraging rules to make it more palatable for plan sponsors to offer such products.

The Treasury Department issued a report calling for the Labor Department and Treasury to craft proposals on how plan sponsors can get help in assessing the long-term financial strength of annuity providers.

Many employers view current rules around the selection of an insurer as too risky to use, and don't offer annuity products as a result. The Treasury's recommendation is meant to "encourage the availability of in-plan annuity options and promote broader consumer choice," according to the report.

The proposal continues a trend witnessed during the prior administration of promoting the spread of lifetime income in 401(k) plans.

"It started under the Obama administration, and still seems to have legs under the Trump administration," said Andrew Oringer, co-chair of the employee benefits and executive compensation group at Dechert. "They're continuing this percolation of ideas that would push people toward annuities."

Only 5% of 401(k) plans offer products with a retirement income guarantee, according to the Plan Sponsor Council of America. About 12% of plan sponsors are considering adding such a product, though.

Proponents of adding lifetime-income options see it as a way to re-frame retirement savings around drawing down rather than accumulating assets. While pension plans offer a monthly income stream to retirees, DC plans often don't have a mechanism for this sort of annuitization or to help them draw down their assets.

"It's a lump sum of money waiting to be spent rather than a flow of income," Mr. Oringer said.

However, not everyone believes broader availability of annuities to plan participants would be a good thing.

Andrew Stoltmann, president of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association, believes individuals "should almost never put a tax-deferred savings investment like an annuity into a tax-deferred savings program."

Besides, "these are illiquid, high-cost, high-fee investments that most clients don't understand and don't need," Mr. Stoltmann said. "The only ones out there who want annuities in 401(k)s are those who stand to profit."

The Obama administration issued rules encouraging the use of certain longevity annuities (qualified longevity annuity contracts) in retirement plans, and also gave plan sponsors its blessing to use target-date funds that bundle in deferred annuities.

It also pursued rulemaking that would require participant statements to include income illustrations based on their current account balance. That project wasn't completed by the end of the administration's tenure.

Now, the Trump administration is stepping into the fray.

Under current "safe harbor" rules, meant to protect employers from fiduciary liability, plan sponsors must assess an insurer's ability to "make all future payments under the annuity contract." However, employers view judging an insurer's solvency decades in the future as too risky, observers said. Indeed, plan sponsors cite fiduciary exposure as their top barrier to implementation, with nearly 40% calling it a concern, according to the PSCA.

The Treasury, in its report published Oct. 27, says independent fiduciary assessments could be "in the form of ratings or other specific metrics" to help plan sponsors comply with their fiduciary duty.

The Government Accountability Office last year urged the DOL to update 401(k) annuity rules, but DOL officials believed at the time that doing so would potentially weaken consumer protection.

Aron Szapiro, director of policy research at Morningstar Inc., suspects a legislative fix during this congressional term is more likely than the Treasury and DOL working to issue new rules, given the DOL's workload at the moment, which includes reviewing the fiduciary rule.

The Retirement Enhancement and Savings Act, which would make it easier to offer 401(k) annuities, passed the Senate Finance Committee last year but has yet to make headway in the current Congress.

Plus, observers believe fixing the safe-harbor rules, while useful, wouldn't cause plan sponsors to jump headlong into lifetime income.

Philip Chao, principal and chief investment officer at Chao & Co., points to annuity portability as an additional challenge. If a participant buys into an annuity but changes jobs and wants to transfer the money to a new plan, would they be able to do so, for example?

"Some kind of exchange has to be set up. It gets really complicated, and that's a problem," Mr. Chao said. "Safe-harbor doesn't talk about the plumbing. It only talks about selecting an annuity from a fiduciary standpoint."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Mar 15


A Fintech Buyer’s Guide for Advisers

Are you ready to invest in technology? Heres everything you need to know before spending a dollar.Many advisers have embraced the value of digital tools to improve their firm, and are ready to invest in new technology to continue their... Learn more

Featured video


Diversity & Inclusion Awards: 2018 nominations are open

Editor Fred Gabriel and special projects editor Liz Skinner discuss the nomination process for InvestmentNews' inaugural Diversity & Inclusion awards.

Latest news & opinion

Broker protocol: Indecision over recruiting agreement is rampant

Ruckus over recruiting agreement has even wirehouse lifers wondering if it's time

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton outlines goals for a new fiduciary standard

Rule should provide clarity on role of adviser, enhanced investor protection and regulatory coordination.

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print