Tax reform: How the House bill changes rules for retirement savings

While pre-tax 401(k) contribution limits are off the table (for now), the Republican tax bill nonetheless makes changes to retirement savings plans

Nov 3, 2017 @ 4:38 pm

By Greg Iacurci

The headline news for retirement plan advisers Thursday upon the unveiling of the House tax bill was that a reduction in the pre-tax 401(k) savings limit is off the table, for now.

But there are plenty of other details in the tax-reform legislation, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, that would affect retirement savings. Here are the most important points.


The tax bill, released Nov. 2, would lengthen the time frame employees have to pay back a 401(k) loan without penalty if they leave the firm or the plan terminates.

Under current rules, if a worker in such circumstances doesn't pay back a loan within 60 days, the loan is treated as a taxable distribution. It's also subject to an additional 10% penalty if the employee is under age 59½.

The bill would extend that time period, giving participants until the due date for filing their tax return for that year to contribute the loan balance to a retirement account. For example, an employee leaving in January 2018 would have until April 2019 to repay the loan.

(More: Why the House tax bill could be a 'bonanza' for advisers)

Hardship distributions

The bill makes a few big changes to 401(k) hardship distributions.

First, it allows participants to continue saving in their retirement plan upon taking a hardship distribution; under current rules, employees must suspend their contributions for six months.

Second, it permits plan sponsors to allow participants to take a hardship withdrawal from two additional pots of money: account earnings and employer contributions. Currently, they may only come from an employee's contributions.

Susan Shoemaker, partner and head of the defined contribution practice at Plante Moran Financial Advisors, said she is "on the fence" about the latter hardship provision because it could potentially lead some participants to abuse hardship distributions. However, she likes the change allowing continued contributions after hardship withdrawals.

In-service distributions

State and local government defined contribution plans, as as well as all defined benefit pension plans (in the private and public sectors), would be allowed to make in-service distributions when participants are age 59½. That's a change from current rules, which require particpants to wait until age 62.

The proposed law would bring pensions and public DC plans in line with current 401(k) rules.

"That's actually kind of a big deal," Brian Graff, CEO of the American Retirement Association, said.

"People could do earlier phased retirements," Mr. Graff said, but also raised the concern that the rule would contribute to leakage from retirement plans at a time when people haven't yet reached retirement age.

Recharacterizations of Roth IRA conversions

A recharacterization of a Roth IRA conversion would no longer be allowed. A Roth conversion allows a taxpayer to convert a traditional, or pre-tax, individual retirement account to an after-tax account, and is a widely used strategy among financial planners. A recharacterization undoes the conversion.


Pre-tax limits

There are some important items to watch out for in the weeks ahead as the House bill moves through committee, the Senate proposes its own tax legislation, and the two ultimately try reconciling differences.

While some are cheering that the House bill didn't reduce the pre-tax savings limit on 401(k) plans, they're not done worrying just yet.

"The good news is that the bill omits the Rothification proposal — no limit on pretax contributions," said Mark Iwry, former senior adviser to the secretary of the Treasury and deputy assistant secretary for retirement and health policy at the Treasury Department. "But this is not the time for complacency. It's still a dynamic process, and the retirement community needs to keep a sharp eye on it, in the House in particular."

Pass-through entities

Prior to the bill's release, there had been concern among retirement industry circles that a tax rate of 25% for all pass-through businesses would lead some business owners to ditch their 401(k) plans.

The thought here was: Why would a business owner paying taxes at the top rate of 39.6%, for example, choose to defer retirement savings? Instead of paying 39.6% on those savings later, the owner of that pass-through business could pay a 25% rate now.

That tax mismatch caused concern that 401(k) plans would prove less valuable to those owners. However, some observers are initially optimistic because the House bill's treatment of pass-throughs came with several restrictions.

"It's extremely complicated, so we're carefully evaluating," Mr. Graff said. "But our first reaction is we're optimistic retirement incentives will remain in place for business owners."


Senate Democrats unveiled a few retirement provisions they would like to see as a part of tax reform, one of which is a federal automatic-enrollment IRA program for workers without access to a workplace savings plan.

These sorts of plans have been enacted in five states — Oregon, California, Illinois, Connecticut and Maryland — as a way to close the workplace coverage gap.

However, they remain contentious among some industry groups such as the Investment Company Institute and the Financial Services Institute. Plus, Republicans are trying to pass tax reform without the help of Democratic votes, and ostensibly wouldn't have to add in sweeteners such as an auto-IRA provision to pass their bill.

But, some are optimistic the provision could make it into a final bill.

"It's ready to go, cheap, and furthers the bill's stated goals of helping the middle class while growing the economy," Mr. Iwry, a proponent of these plans, said. "Tax reform is a sea change; various things could play out."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Apr 30


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 12th annual Retirement Income Summit - the industry's premier retirement planning conference.Much has changed - and much remains to be learned. Attend and discuss how the future is full of opportunity for ... Learn more

Featured video


When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print