Repealing estate tax could open new path to wealth for clients

The solution may be for legislation to preserve the step-up in basis for inherited assets

Nov 14, 2017 @ 1:25 pm

By Bloomberg News

As House and Senate Republicans pursue competing tax overhaul plans, financial advisers should be aware that one big disagreement is the estate tax. House Republicans want to repeal it in 2024 while their Senate colleagues want to preserve it.

The House's repeal plan would be a windfall for a small number of the richest Americans. The estate tax affects only 0.5% of all estates. Both the Senate and House plans would double the estate tax exemption to $11 million from $5.5 million per individual, which would further shrink the percentage of affected estates.

Nevertheless, average Americans dislike the estate tax. A variety of polls over the years have shown that most Americans want to repeal it. Ipsos recently conducted a survey for National Public Radio and found that 65% of respondents favor repeal. That isn't entirely surprising. The freedom to get rich or die trying – as Curtis Jackson once put it – is a cherished American ideal.

(More: 8 top tax and estate-planning tips.)

So it makes sense that most Americans don't want the government to seize their money, however unlikely it is that they will amass a fortune greater than the estate tax exemption.

Repeal of the estate tax would open a never-before-available path for average Americans to enrich their heirs. That path is created by repealing the estate tax and preserving the step-up in basis for inherited assets.


Here's how the step-up works: Let's say a financial adviser, or a client, invests $10,000 in an S&P 500 index fund. The basis is $10,000. Then let's also say that investment increases over time to $50,000. You have an unrealized gain of $40,000, on which you would pay tax if you sold the investment.

But if you bequeathed that investment instead, your inheritor's basis would "step up" to $50,000, which means that inheritor would only pay tax if the investment was sold for more than $50,000.Without the estate tax, the step-up becomes a powerful tool for wealth creation. Let's say you invest that $10,000 in an S&P 500 index fund at age 30.

(More: Tax reform: What advisers need to know about the Senate bill.)

Around the same time, you have two children, which according to the Pew Research Center is the number of children that a plurality of mothers ages 40 to 44 had in 2014. Your investment grows at the S&P 500's long-term annual growth rate of 10%, including dividends, while long-term inflation approximates the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2% a year.


If you then gave equal parts of that investment to each of your two children when you died at age 79 – the average life expectancy in the U.S. in 2015 according to the World Bank – each child would inherit $235,000 in today's dollars.

Here's where it becomes interesting. If every generation passed that investment on to the next, each of your four grandchildren would inherit $1.2 million, each of your eight great-grandchildren would inherit $5.9 million, and each of your 16 great-great-grandchildren would inherit a whopping $30 million. All for doing nothing for 140 years.

(More: Tax reform: What advisers need to know about the House bill.)

Granted, when it comes to investing, nothing is the hardest thing to do (for financial advisers and clients alike). The temptation over those 140 years to raid the investment, or to flee during occasional market panics, or to plunk the money on the latest investment craze would be overwhelming at times. But however difficult, the House plan makes it possible.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13



InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video


Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print