RIA valuations too specific to base on other sales

Selling advice firms to internal successors are toughest types of transactions, experts at Schwab Impact report

Nov 15, 2017 @ 4:39 pm

By Jeff Benjamin

Financial advisers looking to catch a ride on the consolidation wave by putting their firm up for sale should be open to the reality that valuations are often more art than science.

"Stay out of the valuation trap by worrying less about what you think your firm is worth, and think about your value to a potential buyer," said John Furey, principal and founder of Advisor Growth Strategies.

Mr. Furey was joined by Todd Thomson, chairman of Dynasty Financial Partners, speaking about RIA firm valuations on Wednesday in Chicago at the Schwab Impact conference.

"If you're thinking about valuation, focus on what you can control," Mr. Furey said. "The drivers of valuation are profit rate, revenue growth, and cost control. In other words, new clients plus flows from existing clients less attrition, is what you should really be focusing on."

The pace of consolidation in the wealth management space has generally picked up over the past several years and it's projected to continue at an increasing rate. However, firm executives should not try to value their advisory businesses based on published reports of other transactions, the experts said.

(More:Fintechs producing cheaper, automated firm valuations for advisers )

"The biggest challenge we see is unrealistic expectations by sellers, which can result in lower value years down the road when they actually sell," Mr. Thomson said. "One of most important takeaways is that a valuation as an abstract number is interesting, but the real point is increasing the valuation of your firm."

In addition to emphasizing that there are multiple factors beneath the "headline number," the speakers said sellers need to understand that all buyers are not interested in the same things from a registered investment adviser.

In general terms, the speakers categorized potential buyers as strategic, including firms like Mariner Wealth Advisers, financial, such as firms like Focus Financial Partners, and peer-to-peer, which includes firms like Wealth Enhancement Group.

Asked which category of buyer tends to pay the highest price, Mr. Thomson said, "it depends."

"You have to understand the buyer and how you can structure your firm to be as attractive as possible to them," he said. "If you're a retiring adviser, a financial buyer is not interested. A strategic buyer will be looking at what is already in place, and a peer-to-peer acquisition is one of the best deals for a retiring adviser."

On peer-to-peer deals, both speakers described selling to a next generation as among the most complicated to complete. In those cases, "the buyer and seller are really tied to each other," Mr. Thomson said.

Mr. Furey agreed.

(More:Breakaway broker deals a drag on M&A activity in third quarter)

"Internal transactions are the toughest because there is so much going on," he said. "Businesses are worth wherever buyers and sellers meet, and the reality is everything is calibrated by the deal itself."

While it is difficult to apply recent or historical valuations to any existing firm, business owners should always run their businesses as if they are preparing for a sale, Mr. Thomson said.

"It's really important to have a valuation model running on your business," he said. "Whether it's paying for new technology, making investments in the business, or hiring people, it's important to ask what it does to the value of your firm. If you don't do that, I find most firms make mistakes and don't invest enough in some things, and invest too much in other things."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

Upcoming Event

Mar 13



InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video


Advisers beware: tax law has unintended consequences

Commission accounts could be preferable for some clients, and advisers could be incentivized to move from employee broker-dealers to independent channels.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost.

UBS adviser count continues to decline

Firm to merge U.S., global wealth management units on Feb. 1

TD Ameritrade launches all-night trading for ETFs

Twelve funds now can be traded after-hours, but the list will grow, company says.

Cutting through the red tape of adviser regulation is tricky

Don't expect a simple rollback of rules under the Trump administration in 2018 — instead, regulators are on pace to bolster financial adviser oversight.

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print