Lynn Tilton loses dispute over her removal from board seats

Judge rules the Patriarch CEO improperly granted herself permanent control of three firms within Zohar funds she managed

Dec 1, 2017 @ 2:11 pm

By Bloomberg News

Patriarch Partners Chief Executive Officer Lynn Tilton lost a challenge to her removal by Zohar investment funds from the boards of some portfolio companies she claimed to control.

Tilton improperly granted herself permanent control over board seats at three companies within the Zohar funds she once managed and the funds are the firms' proper owners., a Delaware judge ruled Thursday.

Patriarch's Tilton stepped down as manager of Zohar's distressed-debt funds last year after coming under fire from investors and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission about her handling of the entities. She then permanently appointed herself to the boards of three of the companies Zohar managed.

That move caused an improper transfer of "the voting rights attached to the portfolio companies' shares in violation'' of agreements covering the firms, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Joseph Slights ruled.

"We strongly disagree with this ruling and will immediately appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court,'' Richard White, a Patriarch spokesman, said in an emailed statement.

Fund Holdings

The Zohar funds' managers challenged Tilton's refusal to step down from the boards of distressed companies such as FSAR Holdings Inc., Universal Ltd., and UI Acquisition Holding Co. They also accused her of overcharging the companies for management fees.

Patriarch stepped down as manager for the Zohar funds in the wake of disputes with MBIA Inc. and minority investors about the performance of the entities. Investors questioned whether Tilton was unfairly enriching herself at the expense of the companies she was supposed to be trying to turn around.

More than $800 million of debt insured by MBIA is at stake in one of the funds. Patriarch had sought to push one Zohar entity into bankruptcy and impose a reorganization plan that it said would pay MBIA in full.

During a trial in Wilmington, Delaware, Tilton disputed that she charged excessive management fees to the Zohar portfolio companies and countered that the monies were used to help operate the businesses. The fund manager also argued she'd invested her own money into the companies and she controlled the firms rather than the Zohar funds.

In his 96-page ruling, Slights noted Tilton, a sophisticated investor, acknowledged Zohar's ownership of the companies "in several documents she herself executed.'' Since the Zohar funds were the proper owners of the portfolio companies' shares, fund managers "had the authority" to oust Tilton as a director, the judge added.

Earlier this year, Tilton convinced an SEC administrative law judge to reject regulators' allegations that Patriarch Partners bilked investors out of more than $200 million.

The case is Zohar II 2005-1 Ltd. v. FSAR Holdings Inc., 12946, Delaware Court of Chancery (Wilmington).

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Events

Transamerica's Boan: Crafting better retirement income conversations

Retirement income is a challenge for investors. How can advisers have better conversations about retirement income? Transamerica's Joseph Boan offers insights and tips for advisers.

Latest news & opinion

As DOL fiduciary rule dies, variable annuities come alive — sales up for first time since 2014

Indexed annuity sales also broke their previous quarterly sales record.

Cambridge Investment Research bags mid-sized broker-dealer

Broker Dealer Financial Services, an IBD with 150 reps and advisers, and $3.5 billion in assets, will become a Cambridge OSJ.

HighTower on prowl for new CEO, Weissbluth to become chairman

Move is latest in Chicago-based RIA consolidator's effort to expand senior leadership team.

What's in a name? For TCA by ETrade, everything

Trust Company of America is gone, and there's big buzz over the name change. But turning the custodian into an industry powerhouse will take a lot longer — if it happens at all.

When it comes to regulating AI in financial services, murky waters are ahead

Laws are unclear on how the technology fits in with compliance.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print