Senate tax bill changes for pass-throughs more generous than House version, experts say

Senate measure's handling of such small-business income is simpler and makes allowances for more service companies

Dec 6, 2017 @ 2:44 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

Financial advisers and their clients would be better off under the Senate's tax plan for small businesses than the House version, according to experts.

Each chamber has approved its own tax-reform legislation. The two measures are headed for a conference committee to resolve the differences.

One of the ways the tax bills diverge is in their treatment of so-called pass-through businesses — partnerships, S corporations and sole proprietorships in which the owners pay their business taxes on their personal returns at marginal rates that can reach 39.6%.

The House bill would provide a 25% rate on a portion of pass-through income that is determined through a formula in the bill. The House bill would not allow most service businesses, such as accounting and financial advice, to use the lower rate. But it was amended to provide a 9% tax rate on the first $75,000 of income for any business in which the owner earns less than $150,000.

The Senate is more generous to pass-throughs. Its bill would provide a 23% deduction on taxable income for any business with income below $500,000 for married couples and $250,000 for individuals. At incomes above that threshold, the deduction is capped at 50% of wage income.

The Senate's idea is better, according to Paul Samuelson, chief investment officer and co-founder of LifeYield, an asset-management outsourcing firm.

"The deduction is worth more than the lower rate," Mr. Samuelson said. "I like the idea of a certain percentage of deduction rather than dropping the rate. It will help people with less income. Its like a less complicated way of proceeding."

Tim Steffen, director of advanced planning at Robert W. Baird & Co., also likes the relative simplicity of the Senate policy.

"The Senate plan is easier overall to understand because it's a flat exemption," Mr. Steffen said. In addition, the "Senate version is more friendly to service corporations."

Leon LaBrecque, managing partner at LJPR Financial Advisors, agreed that the Senate approach would encompass more business owners.

"It's highly stimulative to small businesses and pass-throughs, including advisers," said Mr. LaBrecque, who is also a CPA and participated on a Michigan Association of CPAs task force that examined the tax-reform bills. "It [provides] a substantial benefit. It's a way better version."

The effective tax rate for small businesses qualifying under the Senate plan would be around 30%, a big drop from the current top individual rate of 39.6%. Such a change in taxation also could affect how much an advisory practice set up as a pass-through is worth.

"It will clearly change the valuation multiplier," Mr. LaBrecque said.

The pass-through provision was a key area of negotiation in the Senate to ensure enough support for the measure, which was approved Saturday on a nearly party-line vote of 51-49.

Conference negotiators will have to keep in mind the narrow Senate spread. Each chamber has to pass an identical bill before it can be sent to President Donald J. Trump to be signed into law. Congressional Republicans want get to the finish line by the end of the year.

"In general, I would expect the House to give up more of their provisions than the Senate would give up of theirs," Mr. Steffen said.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

When can advisers expect an SEC fiduciary rule proposal and other regs this year?

Managing editor Christina Nelson and senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. discuss regulations of consequence to financial advisers in 2018, and their likely timing.

Recommended Video

Path to growth

Latest news & opinion

Bond investors have more to worry about than a government shutdown

Inflation worries, international rates pushing Treasuries yields higher.

State measures to prevent elder financial abuse gaining steam

A growing number of states are looking to pass rules preventing exploitation of seniors.

Morgan Stanley reports a loss of advisers after exiting the protocol for broker recruiting

The firm said it lost 47 brokers in the fourth quarter, the most in any quarter of 2017.

Morgan Stanley's wealth management fees climb to all-time high

Improvement reflect firm's shift of more clients into fee-based accounts priced on asset levels, which boosts results as markets rise.

Legislation would make it harder for investors to sue mutual funds over high fees

A plaintiff would have to state in their initial complaint why fiduciary duty was breached, and then prove the violation with 'clear and convincing evidence.'

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print