Allianz agrees to settle 401(k) fee lawsuit for $12 million

Other companies, including TIAA and New York Life, settled self-dealing suits for millions of dollars in 2017

Jan 2, 2018 @ 11:39 am

By Greg Iacurci

Allianz has agreed to pay $12 million to settle a lawsuit alleging it peppered its company 401(k) plan with dozens of high-cost, in-house funds.

Participants in the 401(k) plan originally brought the suit, Urakhchin v. Allianz Asset Management of America LP, in October 2015 in California district court. The proposed settlement, which would be split among affected employees who participated in the plan between October 2009 and December 2017, must be approved by a judge in the coming weeks.

A spokeswoman for Allianz said the company denies all plaintiffs' claims and believes it acted in the best interests of participants.

"The defendants have chosen to settle this matter to avoid the uncertainty, expense, and burden of additional litigation," the spokeswoman said. "In doing so, the defendants have not admitted any fault or liability whatsoever. The settlement does not require [Allianz] or the plan investment committee to make any changes to the plan's investment lineup."

The proposed settlement comes amid an environment of heightened litigation activity around excessive 401(k) plan fees. Financial services companies have become a primary target, with plaintiffs contending such organizations profit at the expense of their employees by including proprietary investment funds in their retirement plans.

Several major firms agreed to settle such 401(k) self-dealing lawsuits last year, including American Airlines for $22 million, TIAA for $5 million and New York Life Insurance for $3 million.

(More: 10 big settlements in 401(k) excessive-fee lawsuits)

However, some companies have prevailed in their respective legal battles — Wells Fargo and Putnam Investments, for example, defeated similar lawsuits in 2017.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Why a sabbatical is the perk advisory firms can’t overlook

Financial advice firms offering this benefit praise the impact its had on their businesses.

Latest news & opinion

Finra anticipates oversight role for SEC advice rule

CEO Robert Cook says one area for examination could be the proposed requirement that brokers act in the best interests of their clients.

IBDs with the most CFPs

Here are the 10 independent broker-dealers that employ the most certified financial planner professionals.

Why we must create a more diverse and sustainable financial planning profession

CEO explains how, why a firm should commit to conscious inclusion.

Pope Francis wants financial advisers to work like fiduciaries

Vatican bulletin admonishes advisers who act against the best interests of their clients.

Wells Fargo sees slowdown in advisers exiting this year

The 2016 banking scandal and public relations fiasco had alienated some of the firm's advisers.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print