Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans

The 0.05% fee is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution model, but may also make the company's funds less attractive due to higher cost

Jan 22, 2018 @ 4:59 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Fidelity Investments, the largest record keeper of assets held in defined-contribution plans, has begun charging employers a fee on 401(k) assets held in Vanguard Group investment funds.

Starting this year, Fidelity will charge all new 401(k) clients a 0.05% fee on participant assets invested with Vanguard, which has emerged over the past several years as an index-fund behemoth as investors have moved away from active investing.

For example, a plan sponsor with $5 million in Vanguard assets would have to pay an extra $2,500 to Fidelity.

The fee doesn't apply to existing Fidelity clients and will be billed to the plan sponsor, not the plan participants.

Such a move, which observers say is the first of its kind, is ostensibly a response to Vanguard's distribution philosophy. The index-fund giant is the only fund family that doesn't pay Fidelity for shareholder and administrative services the company provides for access to Vanguard's funds.

Fidelity spokeswoman Nicole Abbott said the company is assessing the fee to address this "disparity" and provide "fairness across all its business relationships." Vanguard imposes some unique operational specs that add significant costs to administer its funds, she said.

Observers say such a fee also appears to be a competitive maneuver that will likely make Vanguard funds less attractive as a 401(k) option — especially among larger employers with big retirement plans — and could herald similar moves by record keepers beyond Fidelity. They also believe it speaks to Vanguard's overwhelming success in amassing 401(k) assets the past several years.

"I've never seen it where a record keeper has singled out one fund company and decided to put a specific fee on that fund company," said Aaron Pottichen, retirement services practice leader at the advisory firm CLS Partners. "It speaks to how dominating Vanguard is right now across the entire 401(k) landscape, and really how threatened everyone is by that."

However, Mr. Pottichen also believes assessing the 0.05% fee amounts to a smart business decision.

"Fidelity is a huge funnel of assets to Vanguard, and Vanguard hasn't had to pay any toll fees to Fidelity," he said. "Fidelity probably sees this as a free ride."

(More: Fidelity, American Century adopting new TDF fee tactic as cost pressures grow)

Fidelity provides record-keeping services for about $1.6 trillion of DC-plan assets, according to data tracked by InvestmentNews sister publication Pensions & Investments. That total exceeds that of its closest competitor, TIAA, by more than $1 trillion.

At the same time, Vanguard is the largest money manager of DC assets, overseeing more than $900 billion at the end of 2016, according to P&I data. A decade ago, the top spot belonged to Fidelity; in 2007, Fidelity managed roughly $540 billion in DC assets, while Vanguard managed around $320 billion.

Vanguard spokeswoman Laura Edling said Vanguard's "mutual ownership structure and operating model inhibits us from participating in revenue sharing," and as such the firm doesn't pay platforms or brokerage firms to sell its funds.

Some firms seem to have taken more drastic action in response to Vanguard's distribution model. For example, Morgan Stanley decided to cut Vanguard funds altogether from its wealth-management platform last year.

Philip Chao, principal and chief investment officer at advisory firm Chao &Co., sees Fidelity's move to charge an extra 0.05% as "both defensive and offensive."

It's defensive because Fidelity is currently losing money administering Vanguard funds, absent Vanguard paying for distribution, Mr. Chao said. However, Fidelity is acting offensively by making funds offered by Vanguard, a big competitor, more expensive for plan sponsors.

"Some of it is legitimate," Mr. Chao said. "But primarily they're trying to fight back against losing market share."

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Mar 13

Conference

WOMEN to WATCH

InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Cetera reportedly exploring $1.5 billion sale

The company confirmed it's talking to investment bankers to 'explore how to best optimize [its] capital structure at lower costs.'

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton outlines goals for a new fiduciary standard

Rule should provide clarity on role of adviser, enhanced investor protection and regulatory coordination.

Advisers bemoan LPL's technology platform change

Those in a private LinkedIn chat room were sounding off about fears the independent broker-dealer will require a move to ClientWorks before it is fully ready.

Speculation mounts on whether others will follow UBS' latest move to prevent brokers from leaving

UBS brokers must sign a 12-month non-solicit agreement if they want their 2017 bonuses.

Maryland jumps into fiduciary fray with legislation requiring brokers to act in best interests of clients

Legislation requires brokers to act in the best interests of clients.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print