Capital Group, sponsor of American Funds, wins 401(k) lawsuit

Decision comes as financial services companies, especially those focused on active management, have been sued for self-dealing

Jan 26, 2018 @ 2:17 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Capital Group, which sponsors the American Funds brand of investment products, has won a lawsuit alleging the company profited at the expense of its employees by loading its 401(k) plan with costly in-house funds.

The decision was sure to be welcome news to other financial services companies, which have had to defend against an onslaught of similar excessive-fee lawsuits within the past few years but haven't seen much success.

Plaintiffs in the Capital Group case alleged that more than 90% of the plan's investment options were "unduly expensive" proprietary investments, and that the company could have used a less costly share class of funds, according to the ruling.

California district court judge Dale S. Fischer disagreed, saying the allegations "are not sufficiently plausible to survive a motion to dismiss."

"Unquestionably, fiduciaries need not choose the cheapest fees available to the exclusion of other considerations," the judge wrote in the ruling Tuesday.

Tom Joyce, a Capital Group spokesman, said the company is "pleased with the judge's order, and agrees with the ruling."

Attorneys at the law firm Keller Rohrback, which represented plaintiffs, didn't respond to a request for comment by press time.

The judge said plaintiffs may file an amended complaint for consideration by Feb. 20.

(More: Jerry Schlichter's fee lawsuits have left an indelible mark on the 401(k) industry)

The Capital Group case — D'Ann M. Patterson v. The Capital Group Companies Inc. et al — was filed in June 2017 and comes as litigation over excessive retirement plan fees has expanded even beyond financial services companies and large private-sector employers to universities, unions, small employers and advisers.

Prominent fund companies such as BlackRock Inc., Franklin Templeton Investments and American Century Investments have been among the targets. In all, there have been roughly 20 financial services firms sued, said Duane Thompson, senior policy analyst at fi360 Inc., a fiduciary consulting firm.

While some — including ones against Wells Fargo & Co. and Putnam Investments — have been dismissed, judges have allowed most cases to move forward, Mr. Thompson said.

"A lot of judges have declined motions to dismiss, including at least five other proposed class actions," he said. "I think this one is notable in that it's only one of a few that's been dismissed."

Others sued for self-dealing, including TIAA and New York Life, have settled their cases, for $5 million and $3 million, respectively.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Sponsored financial news

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Featured video

INTV

Why some retirement plan advisers think Fidelity is invading their turf

InvestmentNews editor Frederick P. Gabriel Jr. and reporter Greg Iacurci talk about this week's cover story that looks at whether Fidelity Investments is stepping on the toes of retirement plan advisers.

Latest news & opinion

Is Fidelity competing with retirement plan advisers?

As the Boston-based mutual fund giant expands the products and services it brings to the retirement market, some financial advisers say the firm is encroaching on their turf.

Gun violence hits investment strategies, sparks political debates with advisers

Screening out weapons companies has limited downside.

Whistleblower said to collect $30 million in JPMorgan case

The bank did not properly disclose that it was steering asset-management customers into investments that would be profitable for JPMorgan Chase.

Social Security underpaid 82% of dually entitled widows and widowers

Agency failed to tell survivors that they could switch to a higher retirement benefit later.

If Finra eases firm oversight of outside business activities, broker-dealers could lose revenue

Brokerage firms would no longer be able to charge reps for supervising nonaffiliated RIAs.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print