Mutual of Omaha sued over 401(k) plan fees, investment options

Lawsuit alleges self-dealing in the insurer's use of funds from a wholly owned subsidiary, United of Omaha

Jan 29, 2018 @ 4:06 pm

By Rob Steyer

A participant in the 401(k) plan of Mutual of Omaha sued the company and plan executives alleging violations of ERISA due to excessive fees and to the plan's use of proprietary funds.

"The fiduciary defendants selected numerous investment options for inclusion in the plan solely to line the pockets of Mutual of Omaha at the expense of the plan and its participants," said the complaint filed last Thursday in U.S. District Court in Omaha, Neb. The complaint in Lechner vs. Mutual of Omaha et al. seeks class-action status.

"It is our policy not to comment on pending litigation," Jim Nolan, a company spokesman, wrote in an email Monday.

(More: Lawsuits push 401(k) plan sponsors to cut fees)

The lawsuit said Mutual of Omaha as sponsor of the plan and United of Omaha, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mutual of Omaha, failed to exercise discretion in choosing investments for the Mutual of Omaha 401(k) Long-Term Savings Plan.

The plan had $772 million in assets as of Dec. 31, 2016, according to the latest Form 5500.

"Mutual of Omaha received significant revenues from its wholly owned subsidiary United of Omaha arising out of this course of self-dealing," the complaint states.

The 401(k) plan's menu includes "multiple United of Omaha-branded investments, each of which invests 100% of its assets into another publicly available investment fund," yet the plan charges "significantly higher fees" than is charged for the underlying funds, the complaint said.

In addition, the defendants "caused the plan to overcharge" participants for non-proprietary funds in the investment menu, the complaint said.

(More: In rare move, investment adviser named as defendant in NYU retirement plan case)

Robert Steyer is a reporter at InvestmentNews' sister publication Pensions & Investments.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


What's behind the TCA, ETrade deal?

Deputy editor Bob Hordt talks with senior columnist Jeff Benjamin about what each party in the recent acquisition stands to gain by joining forces.

Latest news & opinion

When it comes to regulating AI in financial services, murky waters are ahead

Laws are unclear on how the technology fits in with compliance.

As Ameriprise case shows, firms on hook when brokers go bad ​

The SEC will collect $4.5 million from the brokerage firm for failing to supervise brokers who were ripping off clients.

10 highest paid professions in America today

These are the top-paying jobs in the U.S., according to Glassdoor.

Ameriprise to pay $4.5 million to settle SEC charges that five reps stole more than $1 million from clients

Agency censures firm for not protecting clients from thieving brokers.

SEC slaps Lockwood with $200,000 fine over unseen trading costs to clients

Clients were forced to pay fees in addition to the usual wrap charges, the regulator maintains.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print