California rep files class action suit against Morgan Stanley

Former broker in San Francisco claims firm did not reimburse reps for expenses

May 15, 2018 @ 2:26 pm

By InvestmentNews

A former Morgan Stanley broker in San Francisco has filed a class action suit against the firm, saying that it violated California labor law and "unlawfully undercompensated" its reps in California for their work.

The suit filed by Brandon Harvey, who worked for Morgan Stanley from 2013 until this year, when he affiliated with LPL Financial in Sacramento, charges that the firm "had a policy and practice of not reimbursing class members" for business expenses.

The suit also questions whether the firm's policies and procedures for its deductions from commissions or other wages are legal and whether its wage statements complied with California law.

For the suit, Mr. Harvey seeks certification of a class that consists of all financial advisers employed by the firm in California in the past four years.

The suit is seeking unspecified compensatory damages and restitution.

(More: Morgan Stanley's success looks long in the tooth to analyst)


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


5 tech innovations you can't afford to ignore

Technology innovation is always top of my at Pershing. What does Pershing have on tap for 2018 and beyond.

Latest news & opinion

Small broker-dealers seek legislative relief from annual audits

Bills introduced in House, Senate would remove PCAOB requirement.

Meet our new 40 Under 40s

For a fifth year, InvestmentNews is proud to shine a spotlight on the amazing accomplishments and potential of top young financial professionals.

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.

10 biggest retirement mistakes

Adhere to enrollment deadlines and distribution rules or pay a hefty penalty.

DOL fiduciary rule on brink of death as key deadline passes

Justice Department didn't petition the Supreme Court to rehear the case. A mandate from the 5th Circuit would finally lay the fiduciary rule to rest.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print