Northwestern University beats Jerry Schlichter 403(b) lawsuit

It's the second university to get a complete dismissal, but lawyers say it's too early to tell if this is a harbinger for pending cases

May 29, 2018 @ 1:48 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Northwestern University has become the second college to beat back allegations of retirement-plan mismanagement, prevailing in a lawsuit brought by prominent plaintiffs' attorney Jerry Schlichter.

The lawsuit, Divane et al v. Northwestern University et al, claimed the university breached its fiduciary duties by having participants in two retirement plans pay excessive fees for record keeping and investment management, thereby eroding their savings. It was originally filed in August 2016.

Judge Jorge L. Alonso, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, dismissed all seven counts with prejudice, meaning plaintiffs, who are retirement-plan participants, cannot file another complaint in district court. They can, however, still appeal to a higher court.

"We are very pleased that this litigation has been dismissed with prejudice," said Philip Harris, vice president and general counsel of Northwestern University. "As we said from the beginning, there is no basis for the claims against Northwestern University."

Mr. Schlichter, founding and managing partner at Schlichter Bogard & Denton, said he would continue to pursue the case on behalf of Northwestern employees and retirees.

"We respectfully continue to believe as many courts, including the Supreme Court, have ruled, that it is a fiduciary breach to have retail funds in a billion dollar plan when lower cost funds are available, and that imprudent funds must be removed from a plan," Mr. Schlichter said. "Moreover, even Northwestern's own consultant expressly admitted that the fees were excessive."

The ruling marks the second complete dismissal of allegations levied against prominent universities over management of their 403(b) plans, a type of defined-contribution plan sponsored by nonprofit institutions.

There have been approximately 20 such lawsuits filed since August 2016, when Mr. Schlichter sued such schools as Yale University, Duke University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, New York University and the University of Pennsylvania, among others.

Mr. Schlichter is well-known for his pioneering 401(k) litigation going back to 2006. His successes include winning a number of large settlements and a judgment in the only 401(k) fee suit to go to the Supreme Court, Tibble v. Edison.

Northwestern University and UPenn are the only university defendants to have received complete dismissals. Others have had partial dismissals of allegations, but other claims were allowed to proceed. The University of Chicago was the first to reach a settlement, for $6.5 million, last Wednesday.

Marcia Wagner, principal at The Wagner Law Group, said it's too early to tell what the dismissals mean long-term.

"Two does not make a trend," Ms. Wagner said. "But I do think this is not a 401(k) excessive-fee class-action redux. [403(b) plans] are very different creatures, and they're very different creatures for historical reasons by way of how they developed."

Judge Alonso alluded to these differences in his ruling.

Addressing his reason for dismissing one of the allegations, he said: "The plans had good reasons, which are outlined in plaintiffs' amended complaint, to offer the TIAA-CREF Traditional Annuity … That is an attractive offering, particularly given that 403(b) plans were originally required to offer only annuities."

Plaintiffs also had claimed there were too many investment options, making it impossible to decide where to invest, that the university offered retail-share-class investment funds instead of lower-cost institutional shares, and that using multiple providers and a revenue-sharing arrangement made record keeping too expensive.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Jul 10

Conference

Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video

Events

Dynasty's Penney: The professionalization of the RIA industry

The RIA profession is evolving rapidly, but why and how? Shirl Penney of Dynasty Financial examines how the industry is growing and consolidating and what's next.

Latest news & opinion

Small broker-dealers seek legislative relief from annual audits

Bills introduced in House, Senate would remove PCAOB requirement.

Meet our new 40 Under 40s

For a fifth year, InvestmentNews is proud to shine a spotlight on the amazing accomplishments and potential of top young financial professionals.

Merrill re-evaluates commission ban in retirement accounts

The wirehouse's wealth management group announces a fresh look at the ban now that the DOL rule is on the brink of death.

10 biggest retirement mistakes

Adhere to enrollment deadlines and distribution rules or pay a hefty penalty.

Finra to overhaul broker information system, cut compliance costs for broker-dealers

The move is intended to cut compliance costs for firms as well as make the registration and disclosure process more efficient.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print