Trump gives federal agencies power to hire in-house judges

Administration seeks to head off turmoil resulting from Supreme Court's recent decision on administrative law judges

Jul 11, 2018 @ 10:28 am

By Bloomberg News

President Donald J. Trump, seeking to head off some of the turmoil from a recent Supreme Court decision, issued an order Tuesday empowering the heads of federal agencies to directly appoint judges who decide cases ranging from Wall Street sanctions to environmental disputes.

The Supreme Court undermined the authority of administrative law judges last month by ruling that they are constitutional officers, potentially casting doubt on whether some of their appointments were properly handled and opening up hundreds of cases to potential legal challenges.

The Supreme Court ruling pertained to the Securities and Exchange Commission, a top financial regulator that is one of dozens of federal agencies that use the in-house judges to rule on internal trials and disputes. Now, many other cases may have to be reconsidered because of improperly hired judges, said James Sherk, a special assistant to the president for domestic policy.

"We're already aware of hundreds of these challenges being brought," Mr. Sherk told reporters Tuesday.

Mr. Trump's order grants agency chiefs greater leeway to choose judges, which could also allow them to ratify currently sitting judges at the Social Security Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor and several other agencies — including a number of financial regulators. Still, the Supreme Court decision leaves many of the administrative law judges' past decisions in jeopardy.

The high court said administrative law judges must be appointed by the president or heads of agencies, not hired as ordinary government workers. Mr. Trump's order discards a complex Office of Personnel Management selection process and establishes a new employment status that allows agencies to appoint judges much like they now hire federal attorneys.

(More: Supreme Court ruling on SEC judges unlikely to upend advice industry)


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


The bizarro world of DOL and SEC rule supporters

Managing editor Christina Nelson talks with senior reporter Mark Schoeff Jr. about why groups that supported the Labor Department's fiduciary rule oppose much of the SEC advice package, and vice versa.

Latest news & opinion

10 most affordable U.S. cities for renters

Here are the U.S. cities that are most affordable for renters, according to Business, which compared the cost of rent to average salaries.

9 best - new - financial adviser jokes

Scroll through for nine new financial adviser laughs.

Captrust, prominent 401(k) advice firm, ramps up its wealth management business

Captrust wants to grow annual revenue from wealth management to 50% from 30% over the next five years.

Fidelity CEO says zero-fee funds aimed at expanding its universe

Johnson says way to prosper in financial services is 'by building relationships.'

SEC advice rule contains a huge hole

Jay Clayton aims to clear up investor confusion by drawing a distinction between brokers and advisers in the agency's proposed package of revised standards. But where do dual registrants fit?


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print