Indexing capital gains for inflation would be tax windfall for clients

Observers say the proposal could open up areas of arbitrage, depending on how it's drafted

Jul 31, 2018 @ 2:35 pm

By Greg Iacurci

A proposal being floated by Treasury Department officials to index capital gains to inflation would, if enacted, bestow a significant tax windfall on many clients of financial advisers.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has indicated he is considering regulation that would alter how individuals compute their capital gains tax, according to a report published Monday in the New York Times.

The capital gains tax is levied on profits from the sale of an asset, such as a stock, business or property. Let's say an investor buys a share of stock for $10, and sells the share after its value grows to $30. The investor would pay tax on the gain, which in this case is $20.

Under the reported proposal, the original cost of the asset — $10 in our example — would be pegged to inflation. That cost basis would rise over time — to $12, let's say. As a result, the investor would pay less in tax, since he or she would be taxed on an $18 gain instead of a $20 gain.

Liz Miller, the president of Summit Place Financial Advisors, said low inflation over the past few years means clients who purchased assets in the short term don't stand to gain much from the proposal. Those with longer-term positions could see big benefits, though.

"Certainly for clients that have held positions for many, many years, that would make a big change to their cost basis," she said.

Paul Auslander, director of financial planning at ProVise Management Group, underscoring this point, said that the proposal would be a "huge" deal for clients if it came to fruition.

The inflation-indexing idea, if put into effect, would follow just months on the passage of a far-reaching tax-reform package that yielded cuts in both individual and corporate tax rates.

The Treasury proposal would cost the federal government $102 billion over the next decade, according to an estimate published by the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a research group within the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

The wealthiest Americans would accrue most of the proposal's benefits, with the top 1% of income earners receiving 86% of the tax cut, according to Wharton. The top 0.1% alone would get almost two-thirds.

Here's an example of how much advisers' clients stand to benefit. Let's say Mr. Thomas bought $500,000 of stock in 1985. He sells the stock in 2018, when it's worth $1.5 million. Mr. Thomas would owe tax on the $1 million gain — which, at the top capital gains rate, yields a total tax bill of $238,000.

Under the proposal, his $500,000 cost would be indexed for inflation. In this case, he would only owe tax on roughly $306,000, for a total tax bill of $73,000. Mr. Thomas would pay $165,000 less in taxes because of the inflation adjustment.

Of course, advisers have many questions. Would the proposal cover assets purchased in past years, or just new purchases? Would it cover all asset types — for example, would it just cover stocks, or encompass broader asset classes, too?

"Even if you just apply it to all assets that might be subject to some sort of capital gain, you're still excluding basic savings and CDs," Ms. Miller said.

The proposal could expose the financial system to a certain level of gaming and abuse, said Steven Rosenthal, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

"If you index the asset side of ledger but don't index liabilities, you have a clear arbitrage for debt-financed investments," said Mr. Rosenthal, who drafted a proposal on inflation indexing in the '90s for Bill Archer, R-Texas, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee from 1995 to 2000.

"People could borrow more money to [purchase] the asset," Mr. Rosenthal added.

Of course, the proposal may not come to fruition. For one, it's not clear whether the Treasury Department has the legal authority to promulgate the regulation, which is something officials are currently taking into consideration, according to the Times report.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Oct 23


Women Adviser Summit - San Francisco

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


The importance of a diverse team

Clients, advisers, and even communities are telling firms that yes, diversity within the advisory community is important.

Latest news & opinion

Joe Duran has a game plan, and anyone can play

The CEO of United Capital built a formula for holistic financial planning that any firm can tap into — for a price.

Ladenburg chairman Phillip Frost steps down

The SEC charged Frost with fraud earlier this month.

Envestnet Tamarac partners with Schwab, TD on digital account openings

Auto-filling documents designed to make onboarding more efficient for RIAs and more convenient for clients.

Wells Fargo plans to cut staff up to 10% within next three years

Bank is struggling to cut spending amid regulatory fines and higher legal costs stemming from scandals.

Universal life insurance lawsuits underscore product risk

Sudden cost increases could cause clients to pay much higher annual premiums — or lapse their policies.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print