InvestmentNews INsider

The INsiderblog

InvestmentNews reporters offer their take on intriguing or controversial articles from around the web.

Fidelity's zero-cost funds raise issues for 401(k) advisers

Fiduciary advisers should be weighing the risks and upsides of securities lending

Aug 2, 2018 @ 4:22 pm

By Greg Iacurci

Fidelity Investments is making 401(k) advisers' lives a little more complicated.

The Boston-based behemoth dropped some eye-popping news Wednesday: as of Friday, it will begin offering two index mutual funds with a price tag of 0.00%. Yes, funds free of cost to investors — the industry's first.

The funds, in the total-market and international equity categories, will be available to retail investors. They won't be offered to participants in defined-contribution plans, at least initially. But let's not kid ourselves — it's only a matter of time before Fidelity or another index-fund giant, perhaps BlackRock Inc. or Vanguard Group, brings a no-cost fund to 401(k) investors.

"It could be a fire-starter," said Philip Chao, principal and chief investment officer at Chao & Co.

It wouldn't be a surprise. No-cost funds represent the extreme of a trend that's been playing out for years in retirement plans. The average asset-weighted expense ratio of index mutual funds has been dropping steadily in 401(k)s — they fell 0.07% (or 7 basis points), to 0.09%, just from 2009 to 2015, according to a report published this year by BrightScope Inc. and the Investment Company Institute.

The introduction of a zero-expense fund to retirement plans would be a marketing play, pure and simple, to attract advisers, plan sponsors and investors, and bring more assets to the firm.

Fidelity has lost ground in the DC-plan asset-manager rankings in the last several years. Going back to 2012, Fidelity was the No. 1 player, with $524 billion in DC assets under management, according to data from InvestmentNews sister publication Pensions & Investments. That pot grew to $715 billion by the end of 2017, but Fidelity now lags behind both Vanguard and BlackRock, which managed $1.1 trillion and $855 billion, respectively.

(More: Fidelity charging new fee on Vanguard assets held in 401(k) plans)

A mediocre 401(k) adviser would likely embrace one of these zero-expense funds, whichever asset manager is providing them, without question. But a good one would realize that there's a hidden risk for participants.

Fidelity isn't running a charity for retail investors. Observers say the company will still make money via securities lending, which entails loaning securities out to borrowers for profit. Fidelity isn't the only asset manager to engage in the practice — almost all index providers engage in securities lending, Mr. Chao said.

Fidelity spokeswoman Nicole Abbott said the firm is not receiving any revenue from its zero-expense funds for securities lending. She also said Fidelity isn't currently receiving any portion of the income that is generated from securities lent out. But that doesn't mean other providers would act similarly.

The index versus active fund debate is a seemingly unending one in the 401(k) industry, given the focus on cost. But the industry rarely if ever discusses the characteristics of index funds beyond their cost and asset class. Does a fiduciary investment adviser owe clients a deeper examination of each index fund? Should they scrutinize the provider's securities-lending policies?

There are at least some advisers who think the answer is "yes."

"As I see it, sure," said Ellen Lander of Renaissance Benefit Advisors Group. "It's an evaluation of the fund."

Each company does securities lending a different way, and the practice comes with inherent risks, advisers said.

"I think it's a fiduciary responsibility to think about the risk, talk about the risk and assess whether the upside is worthy of the risk," Mr. Chao said.

If you subscribe to this philosophy, the responsibility has existed all along — no matter the cost of an index fund — if you think about it. But Fidelity is bringing the subject squarely into focus by virtue of its new funds.

And here's some more food for thought: Like interest rates in some countries, could fees potentially dip below zero sometime down the road?


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Oct 23


Women Adviser Summit - San Francisco

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in four cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Transamerica's Boan: Crafting better retirement income conversations

Retirement income is a challenge for investors. How can advisers have better conversations about retirement income? Transamerica's Joseph Boan offers insights and tips for advisers.

Latest news & opinion

10 highest paid professions in America today

These are the top-paying jobs in the U.S., according to Glassdoor.

Ameriprise to pay $4.5 million to settle SEC charges that five reps stole more than $1 million from clients

Agency censures firm for not protecting clients from thieving brokers.

SEC slaps Lockwood with $200,000 fine over unseen trading costs to clients

Clients were forced to pay fees in addition to the usual wrap charges, the regulator maintains.

Gotcha! 10 lessons from brokers gone bad

These cases show why regulators nabbed reps and firms, and how to avoid their fate.

Tax-credit investigation may trip up Wells Fargo

Justice Department is investigating bank's dealings in tax credits for low-income housing, sources say.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print