Consuelo Mack WealthTrack
Offense vs. Defense: Which side should investors play?
Franklin Equity Group's portfolio manager Edward Perks and IVA Worldwide Fund portfolio manager Charles de Lardemelle discuss how they weighting stocks and bonds today.
This week on WealthTrack, our investment targets are income and
capital preservation. Portfolio manager, Ed Perks, hits the bull's eye
every month with his Franklin Income Fund, while Chuck de
Lardemelle aims for portfolio protection at IVA Worldwide. Income and
protection are next on Consuelo Mack WealthTrack. You at the
Franklin Income Fund have made a major shift in allocation
from bonds to stocks. Tell us about that, what's going
on and why you're doing that? -Yeah, that certainly is
something that's played out a little bit more recently in
2012 in particular. You know, going back the last three
to five years, we did have a higher emphasis on
fixed income markets, on fixed income securities in the portfolio
than we normally have had. And some of that was
out of the opportunity that existed at that time, meaning
we had higher overall interest rates, and we also had
very wide corporate credit spreads, and that's something that, you
know, we felt very compelled about that opportunity on an
income basis, on a total return potential basis as well
as volatility and overall level of risk we were taking
in those securities. -And it certainly worked for the Franklin
Income Fund. -No-- It has. It has benefited from the
tailwind that has been lower long-term interest rates. The actions
of the Federal Reserve, of the global monetary authority certainly
have encouraged investors to look for other riskier assets and,
as you alluded to, that was certainly a response to
the financial crisis was safety and fixed income investing. We've
seen that in the flows across a wide range of
markets. You know, but at this point, you know, we're
compelled to start looking for other asset classes, and it's
not that we can't still find some opportunities in fixed
income,-- -Uh-huh. -but on balance we're finding more opportunities. So
our weighting just in the last 12 months has flipped,--
-Right. -where fixed income a year ago had a predominant
role in the portfolio. We've now reversed that, so from
roughly 55% fixed income down closer to 40%, and equities
have gone the other way. So we don't like to
hold a lot of cash in Franklin Income Fund. It
is a significant drag on income. It's not what we
think our investors are asking us to do. So-- -Right.
And you have an income mandate, right? -Correct, correct. So,
that's what's probably the most interesting, you know, aspect of
it today. Normally, I would say when you shift from
fixed income to equity, you have a real detriment or
a pullback in your overall level of income, and today,
given where fixed income yields are-- -Right. -and where dividend
yields are and, more importantly, where dividend yields are going,
I think that creates a really compelling opportunity. Many of
the companies that we're investing in today, and these are
very high-quality, well-known, global players-- -Such as? -such as Merck,
a substantially higher dividend yield on the common stock than
is available on their long-term debt securities. -On their bonds,
right. -And that's a dynamic that one company after another
you can cite and see, and that's something that we
don't normally see. So, you know, to us, that opportunity
for yield now is biased more toward certain segments of
the equity market. We still think the valuations, although there's
been a lot of talk about the global search for
yield. You know, we don't think it's really progressed very
far at all, and it's still very compelling. -So, Chuck,
you might have a slightly different view. I mean, when
I talked to you in a pre-interview, you basically said
that you're positioning your portfolio more defensively as far as
your equity positioning, and you feel that a lot of
the-- that the dividend plays that Ed is talking about
are actually expensive. So, tell me what you're doing at
IVA Worldwide. -Well, we certainly have the same view that,
in terms of asset classes, equities today are a better--
-Than bonds. -asset class than bonds. -All right. -It's a
better house in a bad neighborhood. -Uh-huh. -We want to
be somewhat conservative, because we do not believe that equities
in the U.S. are extremely-- are that cheap, I would
think, or all that fairly valued. If you look at
market capitalization to GDP, which is the price-to-sales ratio,-- -Uh-huh.
-today in the U.S. market you are 110%. Over the
long term, you were 90%, so it shows a little
bit of over valuation. It's driven in good part by
extraordinary profitability by U.S. corporations. So-- -Right, record profits. -That's
right. So, I think the stock picking can help a
lot. We are about 60% in equities of that you
have in the Worldwide Fund. Of that, you have about
30% in the U.S., about 15 in Europe, and about
10 in Japan. And in Japan, you see the same
dynamics where the dividend yields there can be as high
as 3%, 4% with a 10-year yield that's at 0.75,
so you have the discrepancy that's very much there, and
the payout ratios tend to be fairly low in Japan.
It's been a value market for a long time. It
is a cheap market around tangible book and the question
is whether or not they can snap out of deflation.
-So are you repositioning your portfolio as dramatically as Ed
is, and again, if 60% equities is considered to be
a defensive position, other things that you're doing-- I mean,
you've always had a gold position-- -Correct. -for about 5%
now,-- -Yes. -but your bond position is low, right? Relatively
low? -Low. We have about-- Well, we have about 10%
in high-yield, but it's really the remnants of what we
bought in '08, '09-- -Right. -where credit provided more than
equity-like returns at the time with we thought a lot
less risk, and it turned out to be the case.
Our high-yields are very short in duration, so it's really
a portfolio that's expiring, and as it expires, we either
put the money to work in equities if we can
find the right names or we let the cash build
up. -Right. -So, today we're about 25% in cash if
you include the Singaporean government bonds which is a way
for us to park the cash outside the U.S. dollar,
because we do not trust Bernanke and his policies.
Related Videos
Join the Discussion
Advertisement
Most Watched
Advertisement








