Subscribe

The future of 401(k) plans, as industry leaders see it

the future of 401(k) industry, as industry leaders see it

The business is complex and competitive, and it is changing rapidly, industry leaders noted at several InvestmentNews events

The 401(k) industry is complicated. Multiple vendors must cooperate, with each one adding its own levels of complexity and competition. There are multiple clients, each with different needs and interests. Technology is clunky. Much of the data are either unavailable or inaccessible.

Regardless, the entire participant-directed payroll-deducted industry is hot and evolving rapidly, with outside investment, government oversight and media attention reaching all-time highs. Maybe $10 trillion in assets and 90 million participants are hard to ignore. It’s as big as $20 trillion if IRAs are included.

Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the InvestmentNews RPA Roundtable and Think Tank events were held virtually, over six weeks. Those events included:
1. Chief investment officers (Oct. 29-30)
2. Broker-dealers (Nov. 30-Dec. 1)
3. Aggregators (Dec. 8-9)
4. Record keepers (Dec. 14-15)

Because senior executives in charge of strategy attended, the programs provided valuable insight into the future of the 401(k) industry. Recaps of each of the four events were published, and some themes reverberated throughout.

INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION

As fragmented industries mature, consolidation is inevitable, and most groups see that as both an opportunity and challenge. Those firms with capital, focused acquisition strategies and culture felt well positioned to take advantage of increased scale. Others not able to compete, mostly because prices are so high, were concerned.

CONVERGENCE

All groups recognized the opportunity and challenge to help participants saving for retirement at work. The ability to provide integrated wealth management, retirement income and benefits to plan sponsors and their participants is what’s driving capital to the industry. But the challenges are daunting, ranging from data access, technology and how to serve the constrained investor who cannot afford traditional financial planning.

With more state and federal initiatives to make retirement saving at work accessible, the question is whether current providers can meet the challenge to serve all participants, not just the wealthy ones. Because if they cannot, the concern is that a tech giant like Amazon might give away plan-level services to their business partners to access their workers.

COOPETITION

As each group fights for more revenue from existing clients, competition is inevitable, especially with outside investors fueling industry consolidation. Though record keepers depend on advisers to bring them clients and drive engagement, who owns the relationships with participants in those plans?

THE COVID-19 EFFECT

All sectors had to scramble to serve clients and manage staffs remotely when the crisis hit. Those with scale did better. All groups agreed that many practices that had to be deployed during the pandemic are working well, with the hope they can continue. But few firms expect to have all employees working 100% remotely, and those with significant relationships, books of business and resources will benefit more than those still trying to establish themselves.

LITIGATION AND LEGISLATION

New state and federal laws and regulations were expected and mostly welcomed, as retirement seems to be one of the few bipartisan issues. However, broker-dealers struggle just to keep up with all the new notices and requirements. Pooled employer plans represent a major opportunity for all sectors, especially for record keeper and aggregators. Retirement plan litigation is expected to continue, and record keepers appeared to be the most concerned.

THE FUTURE

Advisers face two important lines of questions about their future in the DC business:
1. Do I want to participate? If not, do I sell, partner or do nothing?
2. If I do want to engage, with whom should I partner? Which record keeper, broker-dealer, aggregator or money manager will thrive?

The focus on retirement is growing worldwide. Employers and employees are expecting more financial solutions at work. The U.S. DC industry is at a crossroads, driven by the pandemic, new laws and convergence, all of which will result in massive consolidation. Advisers have tough decisions to make, but doing nothing is no longer an option. Choose wisely.

Fred Barstein is founder and CEO of The Retirement Advisor University and The Plan Sponsor University. He is also a contributing editor for InvestmentNews’​ RPA Convergence newsletter.

Related Topics: , , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Covid, convergence, consolidation and the 2021 RPA roundtables

Aggregators realize that in-plan retirement income solutions are needed, while CIOs understand that advisers need to be able to help participants navigate the myriad of benefits offered at work.

Chief investment officers critical to success of DC plans, participants

CIOs from the leading DC record keepers, aggregators and broker-dealers discussed their greatest opportunities and challenges.

RPAs need a new name to reach the next level

While 'retirement plan adviser' has been a good description of those who serve ERISA retirement plans, it's actually quite limiting to focus on the plan, rather than the participant.

Who will win the 401(k) battle in the 2020s?

The start of the 2020s has been dominated by the three Cs — Covid, convergence and consolidation. Government mandates could cause the small and startup plan market to explode, and RPA consolidation has blown up.

RPA aggregators focused on convergence, consolidation and cooperation

Unlike any other industry event, the RPA Aggregator event had no agenda. All participants were focused on the defined-contribution industry’s biggest opportunities and challenges.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print