Experts debate if B of A deal's 1-shot or trend

Jul 25, 2005 @ 12:01 am

By Gary S. Mogel

NEW YORK - Experts are debating the repercussions of the settlement between Bank of America Corp. and Massachusetts regulators.

The settlement requires the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank to offer refunds to clients age 78 and older who purchased variable annuities in 2003 or 2004. Among the allegations were charges that the bank sold variable annuities to clients with Alzheimer's disease or who otherwise lacked the ability to understand the investment risks.

"This is earthshaking news to the variable annuity industry," said John Duval, president of a New York-based securities litigation consulting firm bearing his name. "Variable annuity providers will be forced to rethink how they sell this product."

The National Association of Variable Annuities in Reston, Va., has "not gotten a lot of calls from our members on the settlement and have taken no specific position on it," said Deborah Tucker, a spokeswoman.

Prelude to other settlements?

"I don't know what led to them choosing age 78 for the refunds," she added. "Federal and state regulations on variable annuities have not been age specific, although age is a factor built into many companies' suitability screens."

William Galvin, secretary of the commonwealth of Massachusetts, said in a statement that he hopes the bank's settlement will lead to agreements with other banks and broker-dealers involved in his investigation of variable annuity marketing practices.

Probes are under way in other states, including California, Connecticut, New Jersey and New York (InvestmentNews, July 11).

Some industry observers view the settlement as a prelude to similar settlements of charges involving questionable variable annuity sales to the elderly. For instance, there have been charges against Citizens Financial Group Inc., based in Providence, R.I., of selling variable annuities to elderly people who needed the money for more pressing purposes such as paying for an assisted-living facility.

Others view the settlement as a drastic remedy that will be used sparingly and only when a pattern of abuses is found.

Although the settlement was negotiated with the Massachusetts Securities Division in Boston, the bank will offer the refunds - without surrender penalties - to thousands of people age 78 and older nationwide. It also agreed to review the suitability of sales to clients who were 75 to 77 when they purchased variable annuities in 2003 or 2004.

Banks 'too aggressive'

Variable annuity sales practices by non-bank marketing channels such as broker-dealers also are being investigated. But banks are more likely to become liable for mass refund settlements, because their reps are not as well trained in screening variable annuity applicants, according to advisers not affiliated with banks.

"Banks in this state were way too aggressive in how they were marketing variable annuities," said Chris Provo, a financial adviser in Worcester, Mass. "Banks were selling the annuities - promising 6% annual returns - as if they were 6% certificates of deposits, with similar risks."

"Many bank reps don't receive as large a share of the commissions of the products they sell as non-bank reps do, so they try to sell in greater quantities to increase their compensation," he added. Mr. Provo's firm, Provo Financial Services Inc., manages about $25 million.

Fee-only advisers aren't worried about becoming embroiled in variable annuity marketing disputes, because they don't have the type of commission-based motives that lead to the abuses that are targeted by the settlement.

"As a strictly fee-based adviser, we don't sell any products," said Debra Morrison, a wealth manager with Regent Atlantic Capital LLC in Chatham, N.J. She added that she doesn't think much of variable annuities and seldom recommends or discusses them with clients of any age. Ms. Morrison's firm has almost $1 billion under management.

May set precedent

"The BofA scenario was not unique or novel, so I can see other states' using this mass refund settlement as precedent in their own investigations," said Bill Singer, a securities compliance lawyer with Gusrae Kaplan Bruno & Nusbaum PLLC in New York. He said that the bank probably agreed to settle because it is busy integrating its recent acquisitions and has "bigger fish to fry."

"These abuses are systemic problems and not isolated examples," said Mr. Duval. "This type of refund settlement might in the future be forced on variable annuity providers by the NASD," he added. "Settlements are actually the cheap way out - the variable annuity providers might have to pay fines and punitive damages if there's a trial."


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

May 14


Retirement Income Summit

Join InvestmentNews at the 13th annual Retirement Income Summit—the industry’s premier retirement planning conference.Clients and investors continue to search for retirement income solutions and personalized investing advice. This... Learn more

Featured video


Regulators' gloves are coming off with cybersecurity. Put up your dukes with these tips

Updated guidelines and some of the first-ever rule enforcements signal that regulators are getting serious about holding firms accountable for data breaches, according to special projects editor Liz Skinner and technology reporter Ryan Neal.

Recommended Video

Keys to a successful deal

Latest news & opinion

Blackrock exposed data on 12,000 financial advisers

The data appeared in three spreadsheets, linked on one of the New York-based company's web pages dedicated to its iShares exchange-traded funds

Advisers throw cold water on FIRE movement

Millennials love it, advisers don't: Turns out, extreme early retirement is a suitable goal for almost nobody.

10 universities with the most billionaire alumni

These 10 American schools have the greatest number of alumni who are billionaires.

Top-performing ETFs of 2018

The markets took a beating last year, but these exchange-traded funds bucked the trend

Morningstar says investors rushed the exits in 2018

Net flows into mutual funds and ETFs were the lowest since the 2008 financial crisis, while money-market funds captured inflows.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print