Estate lawyers fear being cut out of will

Aug 8, 2005 @ 12:01 am

By Rick Miller

CHICAGO - In the wake of the Terry Schiavo right-to-die case, Congress has been considering ways to promote living wills to the general public.

But some estate planning lawyers are concerned that proposed legislation would sideline them in the end-of-life planning process.

The Advance Directives Improvement and Education Act of 2005, introduced in the Senate in February and followed by a House version in May, calls for enlisting health-care providers in "disseminating information" and "assisting in the preparation of advance directives," also called living wills. The bills make no mention of the role of lawyers in drafting such documents.

"What troubles me is the assumption that a doctor or a medical environment is the right place for this discussion to happen, because in my experience, it is not," said David A. Rubin, an estate planning lawyer in St. Louis.

"The way they are structuring this is, it is going to automatically steer people into that environment, because that's the way they are going to save money," he added. "They are going to find their way into that Venus' flytrap, and once they are in, they are never going to find their way out."

Mr. Rubin, using the Internet, is urging estate planners to contact politicians and state bar associations against the legislation. Among the act's most troublesome proposals, according to him and others, is that it would make an end-of-life planning consultation with a doctor reimbursable under Medicare.

This creates a financial incentive for people to go doctors instead of going to a lawyer, critics of the legislation say.

"What will happen is that the attorneys will be excluded from the process, and the fact is that it is the attorneys who are going to have to litigate these things, and enforce them and interpret them," said Jeffery J. Drach, an elder-law specialist who runs the Drach Elder Law Center in Wausau, Wis.

"I think this bill is pandering to this Terry Schiavo situation," added Steven Leventhal, an estate planning lawyer in Bend, Ore. "I think it is putting people at risk."

The lawyers are at odds with the Chicago-based American Bar Association, which already has come out in support of the act. In fact, this is the third Congress during which the ABA has supported legislation with similar language, noted Charles Sabatino, director of the ABA's Commission on Law and Aging.

"The ABA has no investment in making [the drafting of living wills] a lawyer's task. Lawyers do this regularly, and it is an important part of estate planning, but lawyers don't have a monopoly on it and shouldn't have," he said.

Since a majority of Americans do not have a living will, there needs to be "unified effort" among the medical profession, social-service providers and lawyers to get the message out, Mr. Sabatino added. "It's not the domain of any one of our professions."

The House and Senate bills, which have bipartisan support, come before Congress with the Schiavo case fresh in the public consciousness. Ms. Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state for 15 years while her husband and parents battled in the courts over removing her from life support.

Ms. Schiavo, who died in March, focused national attention on the need for living wills, which spell out whether a person wants life-sustaining medical care should they become terminally ill or brain damaged.

In addition to the Medicare provision, the legislation calls for creating a Department of Health and Human Services public education campaign to raise awareness about advanced directives and the establishment of a clearinghouse where consumers can receive state-specific information.

Also, the act would make advanced directives portable from state to state - an aspect that even critics of the legislation support.

The intention is not to endorse one profession over another, said Christine Hanson, a spokeswoman for Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who has sponsored the Senate version of the bill. A House version was introduced by Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich. Both bills have been referred to committees.

"Sen. Nelson has said he thinks it is a decision that should be made with your doctor, with your lawyer, with your family, your clergy," Ms. Hanson said. "It's not a means of cutting out lawyers. The fact of the matter is, not every single American goes to a lawyer, so we are trying to find a common denominator."

Hospitals already are required to ask patients if they want information on living wills when they are admitted, she noted. Mr. Nelson has proposed in a separate bill that people be asked if they want information on living wills when they sign up for a driver's license, as well.

The information clearinghouse being proposed also would be a means for any profession or group to provide information to the public, Ms. Hanson added.

The awareness campaign and clearinghouse are among the aspects that bother Mr. Leventhal, the Oregon lawyer.

The legislation would open up the practice of offering living wills to "any business who wants to sell these documents out of a storefront by people who don't have the training."

"The person, in my opinion, to really explain these is not the doctor, is not the hospital, is not somebody selling a document - Advanced Health Care Directives Inc.- none of those parties will explain these end-of-life decisions the way a competent attorney will do it," Mr. Leventhal said.

Mr. Rubin is concerned that the bill would affect the livelihood of estate-planning lawyers. The need for a living will can prompt people to consult a lawyer and then might lead to discussions about estate planning or preparing other documents such as a will or power of attorney.

"It hurts our livelihood, because really, people should be using the Schiavo situation and these kinds of questions as a way of encouraging everybody to go see a lawyer. And instead what this is doing is, it's going to encourage people to go see a doctor," Mr. Rubin said.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

RIA Data Center

Use InvestmentNews' RIA Data Center to filter and find key information on over 1,400 fee-only registered investment advisory firms.

Rank RIAs by

Upcoming Event

Nov 19


New York Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Featured video


Why millennial demand for ESG is falling on deaf ears

Editorial director Fred Gabriel and senior columnist Jeff Benjamin say there's a disconnect between the big appetite for environmental, social and governance funds in 401(k) plans and their offering.

Latest news & opinion

Brian Block continues his legal fight to stay out of prison

A judge denied Mr. Block's motion for a new trial, but he wants another day in court.

10 social media stars you're not following yet, but should be

Some of the great people using social media to discuss wealth management and financial advice who might not be on your radar.

Wells Fargo could be putting more of its focus on wealth management

Speculation is mounting that the bank is dumping some lines of business to focus on just a few areas, including financial advice.

Choosing between a retroactive lump sum and a bigger monthly Social Security benefit

Some retirees can receive up to six months of back benefits.

Blucora to buy another broker-dealer with tax-focused advisers

Blucora is paying $180 million in stock for 1st Global, with 850 advisers.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print