Some reps see changes to marketing, sales fees

Nov 7, 2005 @ 12:01 am

By Bruce Kelly

NEW YORK - Some registered representatives are seeing losses or gains to their incomes as mutual fund companies jockey to pay reps for selling funds amid an ever-shifting regulatory landscape.

A variety of brokers have seen recent changes from three fund companies.

Most notably, reps affiliated with InterSecurities Inc. of St. Petersburg, Fla., last month were told that marketing, or 12(b)-1, fees would be eliminated on 11 Transamerica IDEX asset allocation portfolio funds that were closed to new investors as of Oct. 31.

InterSecurities and IDEX Management Inc., also of St. Petersburg, are owned by insurance giant AEGON NV of The Hague, Netherlands.

One other fund company making changes is Van Kampen Investments Inc. of Oakbrook Terrace, Ill. Also, Royal Alliance Associates Inc., a New York-based broker-dealer, is changing how advisers get paid for selling the Seattle-based WM Group of Funds.

When fund companies change fees to reps, it often can create a thorny, behind-the-scenes issue for the brokers, industry observers said.

'Betrayal' to reps

If a rep moves the clients to a new fund, the client could face a tax problem. But if the broker leaves the client in the account, they don't get paid, and the client then runs the danger of seeing service suffer, observers said.

"The board of directors wasn't living up to their fiduciary responsibilities by eliminating the fund choices," said one InterSecur-

ities broker, who asked not to be identified.

"But also it was a betrayal to the reps who sold the funds over the past 20 years."

In an Oct. 14 memo, InterSecurities' registered reps were told that Transamerica IDEX was stopping its sale of A, B and C shares on the 11 funds, with current shareholders able to invest through the end of February.

After that, the funds "will cease the payment of distribution and service (Rule 12(b)-1) fees by each class of shares," according to the memo.

The distribution of 12(b)-1 fees to brokers and advisers has been a hot topic in the industry and among securities regulators up until recently, industry observers said.

Interest has cooled, observers said, as regulators have become more aware of the way in which fees are used.

Other fund companies have been switching policies regarding fees.

In a turnaround, Van Kampen said in a September notice to shareholders that it once again was changing how it was paying brokers and advisers who sold their funds in 403(b) plans.

In June, Van Kampen cut the sales load that brokers collected when selling their funds in retirement accounts designed for employees of non-profit institutions such as public schools (InvestmentNews, June 6).

Now Van Kampen wants those advisers to get paid for working with clients, with the changes taking place Dec. 5.

"The result of this change diminished the ability of a financial adviser to provide [the client] with investment advice and retirement-planning guidance," Van Kampen commented in its notice to shareholders.

"The revised policy, which permits the sales of fund shares with a sales charge where appropriate, provides for continuity of service to you from your financial adviser."

"Van Kampen values and supports the role financial advisers play in working with their clients," said Chad Peterson, a New York-based spokesman for the company, which is a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, also of New York.

That hasn't prevented broker-dealers from pruning back fund company fees to brokers and advisers that they don't deem appropriate.

Royal Alliance recently told its clients that at the end of September, its advisers would no longer receive a half percentage point fee its advisers collected on sales of revenue-sharing agreements with some funds sold by the WM Group of Funds.

That is on top of the quarter point of 12(b)-1 fees, said one adviser, who also asked not to be identified. That cut, however, won't affect the adviser's decision, as WM is "a good group of funds," the adviser said. The half point "is irrelevant."

"WM Advisors fully supports any decision broker-dealers make with regard to accepting or not accepting" the fifty basis point fee, said Libby Hutchinson, a company spokeswoman.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 19


New York Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Vermont establishes restitution fund for victims of investment fraud

Portion of settlements with financial perpetrators would supply the pool.

10 IBDs with the most variable annuity revenue

Although the popularity of VAs has declined in recent years, some independent broker-dealers still do a good business in them.

Target-date fund design may be wrong for retirees

Researchers suggest the funds don't adequately hedge against sequence-of-returns risk in retirement.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print