Subscribe

Stanford Ponzi case pits SEC against court-appointed receiver

The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken the unusual step of opposing what a court-appointed receiver is doing in the massive Ponzi case that involves companies owned by Robert Allen Stanford.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has taken the unusual step of opposing what a court-appointed receiver is doing in the massive Ponzi case that involves companies owned by Robert Allen Stanford.

According to briefs and motions filed yesterday evening and released today, the SEC opposed actions taken by Stanford receiver Ralph Janvey to attempt to recover principal and interest from hundreds of Stanford victims who received payments of certificate of deposit principal from Stanford International Bank Ltd., a company in Antigua, West Indies, that was controlled by Mr. Stanford.

“The receiver’s claim to recover principal lack statutory and case law support, and it would be inequitable to require the innocent investors to repay these amounts,” the SEC said in briefs filed with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Thousands of other investors, including those outside the court’s jurisdiction, have received principal payments from Stanford International Bank, the SEC said in a release.

“It would be unfair to make this small subset of admittedly innocent investors return the funds they invested, or even litigate, while thousands of similarly situated investors are not pursued,” the SEC said.

Calls to Mr. Janvey, who is also a partner in Krage & Janvey LLP, a law firm based in Dallas, were not returned.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Incoming NAPFA head looks to keep advisers from growing up, out of group

Incoming NAPFA chairman William Baldwin is looking to find ways to keep firms involved in the 2,150-member organization once they get larger.

State regulator says SEC dropped the ball on private placements

Don't blame state regulators for the financial crisis; blame those who took power away from state regulators.

Should annuities be mandatory for 401(k)s? Fund companies go on the offensive

Participants in 401(k) plans do not want the government to require them to convert a portion of their 401(k) assets to annuities, according to the results of a survey of about 3,000 households released today by the Investment Company Institute.

Labor chief wants to add annuities to 401(k) mix

Encouraging employers to offer annuities in pension plans will be one of the Labor Department's top regulatory goals in 2010.

Schapiro: SEC will act on 12(b)-1 fees this year

The Securities and Exchange Commission will reassess the 12(b)-1 fees collected by brokers as compensation for selling and servicing mutual funds, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said today.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print