Retirement Watch

Collaborative advice drives success

Affluent investors do better over the long term when they are engaged with advisers

Oct 25, 2009 @ 12:01 am

By Larry Cohen

Households that regularly receive advice are better prepared financially for retirement than households that do not receive advice as often.

That's the essence of the findings of a recent report, “Financial Advisors and Boomers,” that I recently completed with Elvin Turner of Turner Consulting LLC for the Retirement Income Industry Association.

We sought to explain this differential in preparedness, and found four equally important reasons:

• There is a connection between frequency of advice and financial preparedness.

• Advice is most effective if provided in a collaborative relationship.

• Households must be committed to participating in this collaboration by learning as much as they can about their finances and updating themselves on new developments in topic areas.

• Advisers must enable households to invest and stay invested. They do that by first by helping households to develop a strategy, then by mitigating their downside risks and through wise long-term investment.

As in any relationship, it takes two active parties to collaborate effectively. Advisers who collaborate with affluent households — we studied households with at least $100,000 in inflation-adjusted investible assets in 1994 and 2004 — enable those households to thrive financially. In fact, regular advice appears to be a critical factor to providing a significant benefit when comparing net worth, total assets or financial assets over a 10-year period; the same pattern exists for the periods 1996-2006 and 1998-2008.

The research suggests that collaborative advisers provide the most benefit to households by helping them construct a comprehensive financial strategy. But most important, they assist in assembling the network of legal, financial investment and risk management advisers and programs that support a household's financial affairs, helping it to invest wisely and protecting it from unforeseen, but inevitable, misfortunes.

The cross-silo approach is careful, deliberate and wide ranging. While some of these services are not as dramatic or immediate as picking the right stocks, they likely account for the superior financial performance of millions of well-advised households.

As we look for factors to explain the superior financial preparedness of households that obtain financial advice “always” or “sometimes” before major financial decisions, the use or non-use of various sources of information is another factor to include. More than 80% of such households reach out to various sources in order to receive information. Less than 50% of the never-advised households use any in-formation sources.

There are some key differences between households that always use advisers and those who sometimes use them. Indeed, more always-advised households use a limited number of impersonal information sources (such as financial newsletters and brochures) and personal sources (financial institution personnel, and friends and relatives). The sometimes-advised households use more information sources.

Always-advised households are more likely to use financial newsletters, brochures, institution personnel, and friends and relatives as sources.

Households use different types of financial advisers based on how often they seek advice. Generally, the always-advised households tend to pick one of many kinds of professional financial advisers more than the sometimes-advised households.

Over the past two years, the always and sometimes households report using full-service brokers, certified financial planners, bank/ savings-and-loan advisers, lawyers, captive agents, credit union advisers and private bankers to a comparable degree. But the always households are more likely to use independent financial planners (29%) and certified public accountants (25%), while the sometimes households are more likely to us mutual fund advisers (17%), independent insurance agents (10%) and discount brokers (6%).

Financial advice differs with the client's wealth. Mass-market always-advised households are much more likely than their peers to have received investment advice recently. Always-advised affluent households want overall advice and estate planning in addition to investment advice. Wealthy always-advised households get every type of advice more often than their somewhat-advised peers.

Interestingly, the opposite occurs as households age.

For advisers, the key insights of the findings are that successful clients are those with whom the adviser works hard to inform, protect and equip.

Larry Cohen is vice president for consumer financial decisions at SRI Consulting Business Intelligence.

For archived columns, go to investmentnews.com/retirementwatch.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Jul 09

Conference

Boston Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched

INTV

Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.

INTV

Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.

X

Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print