In re, BrokerCheck: SIFMA urges Finra to expand 'in re expungement

Association wants to make it easier for brokers to clean up their official records

May 25, 2012 @ 3:04 pm

By Dan Jamieson

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association wants Finra to establish a process by which individual brokers could expunge unproved customer complaints from their disciplinary records.

"A fair and efficient expungement remedy should be available to all registered persons that are the subject of unfounded claims," SIFMA associate general counsel Kevin Carroll wrote in a letter to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. this week.

The letter came in response to a request for commentby Finra for a proposal that would allow representatives to expunge arbitration claims from their BrokerCheck records when they were not personally named in the claim.

In 2009, Finra required individual brokers to report any arbitrations in which they are involved, even if they are not a named party. This change closed a loophole that allowed brokers to avoid disclosing many customer claims.

As a result, however, representatives have had no way of challenging a claim in which they are not named, other than by asking their firm to seek expungement on their behalf, seeking to intervene in the case or filing an entirely new arbitration claim requesting expungement.

In proposing the so-called "in re" expungement process last month, Finra said it had received numerous inquiries from brokers who felt that an arbitration claim was unfounded or that they were incorrectly identified as the alleged violator.

The comment period closed Monday.

SIFMA wants the in re process expanded to any type of complaint in addition to arbitration claims.

"SIFMA believes that the continued disclosure of denied or unfounded written customer complaints serves no regulatory purpose," Mr. Carroll wrote, noting that unproved complaints remain on a broker's public record as long as the individual is registered and for 10 years after he or she leaves the industry.

The Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association, which represents plaintiff's attorneys, is worried that an in re process might force public customers to go through another arbitration process, and urged Finra to limit the expungement proceedings while giving customers an opportunity to challenge the request.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Financial health of advisory firms is excellent. Or is it?

Deputy editor Bob Hordt and senior columnist Jeff Benjamin discuss the fact that double-digit growth in revenue and assets doesn't necessarily spell a rosy future.

Latest news & opinion

Don't be fooled by the numbers — the industry is in a dangerously vulnerable state

Last year's stock market gains helped advisers turn in solid growth in assets and revenue, but that growth could disappear in the next market downturn.

Divided we stand: How financial advisers view President Trump

InvestmentNews poll finds 49.2% approve of his performance, while 46.7% disapprove. How has that changed over the course of his presidency?

10 states with the most college student debt

Residents of these states have the most student debt when you consider their job opportunities.

Invesco to buy OppenheimerFunds

Deal brings Invesco another $246 billion in assets, as well as high-fee actively managed funds.

Dawn Bennett found guilty of $20 million Ponzi scheme

Jury took less than five hours to convict the former financial adviser and radio host.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print