GM pension deal heaps 'significant risk concentration' on Pru: Moody's

Insurer faces asset liability management and longevity risks tied to pension obligations; 'credit negative'

Jun 12, 2012 @ 2:02 pm

By Darla Mercado

Prudential Financial Inc.'s move to relieve General Motors Co. of some $26 billion in pension obligations is considered a “negative” event by Moody's Investors Service.

The ratings agency said the deal was a “credit negative” for the life insurer because the GM contract will represent more than 5% of Prudential's general account holdings.

In the deal announced earlier this month, 42,000 salaried GM retirees will be given the option of taking a lump sum payment or a monthly pension payment check, to be paid by Prudential, not GM. The plan kicks in Jan. 1. On that day, the remaining 76,000 salaried retirees will have their pension payment shifted to Prudential, as well.

“That amount poses a significant risk concentration, given the challenges of managing a long-duration portfolio, estimating longevity risk and investing any portion of the proceeds not provided through existing investments in a low-yield environment,” Scott Robinson, a senior vice president at Moody's, wrote in a research note Monday.

Though Prudential's expertise lies in managing mortality risk, taking on GM's pension liabilities opens the insurer to the risks that the automaker faced while it carried the obligation on its books. One example cited by Mr. Robinson: Prudential still will have to find sufficient long-duration investments to cover liability cash flows over a period of decades.

The carrier also is taking on the risk that the retirees would live longer than expected, he added, which would require Prudential to make more payments than anticipated.

“If they live longer than Pru forecasted, that negative surprise from the company's perspective will cut into the company's profit on the GM transaction,” Eric Berg, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets LLC, wrote in a June 4 note.

The deal will account for a large portion of Prudential's deployable capital. “If, hypothetically, GM transfers $20 billion of assets to Prudential, we expect the company to allocate at least 5% of assets or approximately $1 billion of capital,” Mr. Robinson wrote. The insurer had estimated it had about $2 billion to $2.25 billion in readily deployable capital as of the end of 2011.

Still, the deal has its upsides: Transferring the liability does provide a possible earnings source for Prudential and counterbalances the mortality exposure on its life insurance business, Mr. Robinson wrote.

Dawn Kelly, a spokeswoman for Prudential, said the insurer doesn't comment on reports from ratings agencies. "As a highly regulated insurance company, we're required to maintain sufficient capital and appropriate reserves to meet our obligations," she added.

Some analysts believe that more of these pension risk transfer deals are coming, For his part, Mr. Robinson believes that Prudential and MetLife Inc. are the two U.S.-based carriers large enough to shoulder deals of this magnitude. But midsize carriers may step up to meet demand from smaller firms, he added.

Whether there is indeed enough capacity in the industry to service a raft of underfunded defined-benefit pensions still a matter of debate among actuaries and consultants.

“Capacity is an issue,” said John Fenton, a director at Towers Watson. “Carriers are concerned about the fact that you can't get many good investments beyond 20 years. The supply of fixed income investments is limited and I think having enough capital to back these products is an issue for some companies.”

Don Fuerst, senior pension fellow at the American Academy of Actuaries, echoed that sentiment. “The unfunded retiree obligations of pension plans in the U.S. are in the hundreds of billions of dollars, and I don't think there's sufficient capacity to handle all that."

While few insurers are likely to follow Pru's lead in the near future, more of these transactions are likely in the long term, Mr. Fuerst predicted.

“The insurers will look for ways to raise additional capital to establish the capacity.”


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Upcoming Event

Mar 14



InvestmentNews is honoring female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders at their firms. These women have advanced the business of providing advice through their passion, creativity, inclusive approach and... Learn more

Featured video


Where in the U.S. are RIAs growing the fastest?

InvestmentNews' deputy editor Robert Hordt talks to senior columnist Jeff Benjamin about his report on how registered investment advisers are faring in different regions of the country.

Latest news & opinion

10 tips for hiring top young advisers

Hiring is not easy and retaining good employees can be even more difficult. Here's a roadmap for bringing on new advisers and training them — and even firing them, if necessary.

Kestra Financial latest broker-dealer to be put up for sale

The independent B-D's owner, Stone Point Capital, has tapped Goldman Sachs to lead the deal.

Wells Fargo Advisors 2019 comp plan sees little change

But lowest-producing advisers face a pinch in pay.

8 adviser fears for 2019

Interest rates, trade wars and bear markets, oh my! Looking across the industry, here are some of the biggest concerns heading into the new year.

3 big reasons to do a Roth conversion right now

The time is ripe for many to convert a pretax IRA to a Roth.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print