Coming if Obama wins: 'Aggressive' financial regulation

Ex-DOL officials say reproposed fiduciary rule likely to resurface after elections — assuming the incumbent gets the nod

Jun 26, 2012 @ 4:18 pm

By Mark Schoeff Jr.

For the moment, regulatory activity in the Obama administration is dormant. But it is likely to pick up rapidly if President Barack Obama is re-elected in November, an official in the George W. Bush administration said Tuesday.

For the past six months, no regulations have been sent by the Labor Department's Employee Benefits Security Administration, including one that would overhaul fiduciary duty rules for retirement plans, to the White House, according to Bradford Campbell, counsel at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, who served as assistant labor secretary in charge of the EBSA from 2007 to 2009.

“That's a pretty unusual dry spell,” Mr. Campbell said at the Insured Retirement Institute regulatory conference.

“I can't recall a time when the pipeline has been completely empty for six months,” he said later in an interview.

It also means that a rule that would significantly expand the definition of “fiduciary” for anyone providing investment advice on retirement plans is unlikely to surface until after the election. The rule, which was withdrawn in September 2011 amid fierce industry opposition, still must be re-proposed and approved by the Labor Department. Once it is sent to the White House, it will take up to three months for it to be vetted by the Office of Management and Budget.

Despite the slowdown, opponents of the rule, which argued that was too expansive, shouldn't breathe a sigh of relief, according to Mr. Campbell.

If Mr. Obama is re-elected, the DOL rule is likely to have a strong second wind at its back.

“Will we see much more aggressive regulation when there's not an election on the horizon? I fear we will,” Mr. Campbell said in the interview.

After a victory by Mr. Obama in November, “we're likely to see a renewed push for some fairly aggressive financial regulation,” Mr. Campbell said.

In an appearance before an industry group and in a letter to Congress last week, Mr. Campbell's successor as head of the employee benefits agency, Phyllis Borzi, said that the Labor Department is working on a new fiduciary duty proposal, but she declined to say when it would be released.

Ms. Borzi said that the definition of “fiduciary” under retirement laws must be updated to better protect investors from conflicted advice as millions are trying to build a nest egg through individual retirement accounts and 401(k) plans.

Industry opponents and members of both parties of Congress adamantly counter that the original DOL proposal would subject IRAs to fiduciary duty for the first time, potentially driving brokers out of the market and leaving workers and retirees nowhere to turn for investment advice on the products.

The re-proposed rule will still incorporate IRAs, according to Ms. Borzi.

In order to address another concern of opponents— that the original lacked a sufficient regulatory-impact assessment — she said that the department is conducting a rigorous cost-benefit analysis.

“While the department was disappointed not to receive many of the suggested data elements from industry sources, we have met with industry representatives and asked them to provide whatever information they had that would be useful to our efforts,” Ms. Borzi wrote in a June 20 letter to the leaders of the House Education and Workforce Committee. “We will incorporate all of this information and feedback into our updated economic analysis of our updated proposal.”

Like many other critics, Mr. Campbell said that the original fiduciary proposal would have prevented brokers from earning compensation from IRA transactions.

Ms. Borzi and fiduciary proponents have said that brokers would still be allowed to charge commissions.

Mr. Campbell hopes that a clarified sales exemption will sort out this area.

“The way it was written [in the original proposal] was very ambiguous,” he said. “How it is articulated in the new proposal might address some of these concerns.”


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 13


Top Advisory Firm Summit

Formerly known as the Best Practices Workshop, this new one-day conference will also include content from the Best Places to Work event!The Top Advisory Firm Summit will provide CEOs, COOs, CTOs, CMOs, and Managing Partners from the... Learn more

Most watched


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

Galvin to propose fiduciary rule for Massachusetts brokers

The secretary of the commonwealth is proposing a fiduciary standard in response to an SEC investment-advice rule he views as too weak.

Summer reading recommendations from financial advisers

Here are some books that will keep you informed and entertained during summer's downtime

4 strategies for Roth conversions

There's never been a better time to do a Roth conversion, and here are several ways to go about it.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print