On Retirement

Secret weapon for maxing out Social Security? Your spouse

With the right elections, married couples can dramatically up their payouts

Aug 8, 2012 @ 11:20 am

By Mary Beth Franklin

Hardly a day goes by that I don't receive an e-mail from InvestmentNews readers about Social Security claiming strategies. I usually respond to them privately, but this was such a good question from a financial adviser in Los Angeles, that I wanted to share it with a wider audience.

Sean wants to know if both a husband and wife can each claim a spousal benefit based on the other's earnings record. The short answer is no, but there are still ways for married couples to coordinate and maximize their Social Security benefits. Apparently there have been several press reports recently that muddied the waters on this issue. As usual, I went straight to the source — the Social Security Administration — to set the record straight.

If both spouses waited until their normal retirement age — currently 66 — one could file and suspend and delay collecting his or her benefits until age 70 when they are worth the maximum amount. Social Security benefits increase by 8% per year for every year you delay collecting between ages 66 and 70. So if you wait until age 70 to claim, your retirement benefits will be worth 132% of what it would have been at your normal retirement age of 66.

By filing and suspending, you are telling the Social Security Administration that you want to file for the purpose of triggering benefits for your spouse, but delay collecting your own until they will be worth more later.

Let's say the husband is entitled to $2,000 per month at age 66. His wife's spousal benefit would be worth half of his full retirement benefit — $1,000 per month in this case — if she collects at 66; less if she collects earlier. The earliest you can collect a spousal benefit is age 62. In that case, her spousal benefit would be worth 35% of the worker's full amount — $700 per month — rather than $1,200 because she collected it four years early.

But if the wife also waits until her normal retirement age, she could file a restricted claim for spousal benefits only. That means she would collect $1,000 per month, which is half of her husband's full retirement benefit that he didn't collect. And because she restricted her claim to spousal benefits only, her own retirement benefit would accrue delayed retirement credits of 8% per year until she claimed the maximum amount at age 70.

Let's review. The husband's full retirement benefit at age 66 is $2,000 per month but he files and suspends so he will delay collecting until age 70 when it will be worth $2,640 per month. The wife files a restricted claim at age 66 for spousal benefits only and receives a spousal benefit of $1,000 per month. Let's say her own benefit, which she defers, is worth $1,800 per month. At age 70, it would be worth $2,376.

Assuming they are both the same age, their combined Social Security benefit at age 70 would be $5,016 per month compared to $3,800 if they had each collected benefits at their normal retirement age. In addition, the larger benefit will serve as a bigger base for future cost of living adjustments and lock in the largest survivor benefit for the wife if the husband dies first.

Bottom line: husbands and wives cannot each claim a spousal benefit, but both can maximize their benefits by waiting until 66 — what I like to call the “magic age” — to elect a claiming strategy. One can file and suspend. The other can restrict the claim to spousal benefits only. And both can earn delayed retirement credits to maximize their benefits.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Nov 20


Future of Financial Advice

An innovative conference dedicated to improving the client experience by enhancing digital technology, mainstreaming healthcare and optimizing wealth management strategies.The Future of Financial Advice will provide a forum for... Learn more

Most watched


Schwab's Jeff Kleintop: Prep for volatility given China trade uncertainties

China could be considered a developed market in five to seven years , according to Jeff Kleintop, chief global investment strategist, Charles Schwab.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Funding for Reg BI, other SEC advice reform efforts denied in Waters amendment

House likely to approve measure that effectively kills rule package, but it faces uphill battle in Senate

Wall Street lashes out at Sanders' plan to pay off student debt with a securities trading tax

Financial pros argue that a transaction levy will hurt mom-and-pop investors along with investment houses.

GPB paid B-Ds and reps steep commissions to sell troubled private placements

GPB paid commissions of 9.3%, or $167 million altogether, on the firm's private placements.

Give us a break, active managers say

Seven portfolio managers share their outlooks for the rest of the year, generally agreeing that it's been hard for active managers to stand out.

GPB Capital reports decline in value of two biggest funds

One has dropped by 25.4% and the other by 39%, according to the company.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print