Busting the myth of manager diversification

Rick Ferri's firm finds that the more active funds held, the higher the underperformance

Jun 20, 2013 @ 3:43 pm

By Jason Kephart

Investing with multiple managers in a single asset class may seem like a good way to hedge against underperformance, but a new study shows that that actually may hurt returns.

Nine out of 10 portfolios that used three active managers per asset class over the 16-year period through 2012 failed to beat a comparable portfolio of index funds, according to a new research report by Portfolio Solutions LLC and Betterment LLC.

The study used 5,000 randomly created actively managed fund portfolios based on data from the CRSP Survivor-Bias-Free U.S. Mutual Fund database to calculate the performance.

Portfolios with just two actively managed funds did slightly better, as 13% beat a comparable portfolio of index funds.

Using just one actively managed fund per asset class gave a portfolio the best chance to outperform, though it still beat an all-index portfolio only 17% of the time.

“You're better off with one active fund and hoping for the best,” said Rick Ferri, founder of Portfolio Solutions. “The more active funds you have, the higher your probability of underperformance.”

The problem with the multiple-manager approach isn't just that the majority tend to underperform over any given time period but that the funds that do outperform don't do so by enough to offset the losses.

Of the 10% of funds that outperformed over the 16-year period, the median return was 0.29% above their respective index.

The median performance of the underperforming funds was 0.93% below the index, according to the study.

One way to boost performance was to stick with actively managed funds with below-average fees.

Portfolios made solely of those funds performed better on both the upside and downside than the general universe did.

The median outperformance of an actively managed fund portfolio with below-average fees was 0.33% and the median underperformance was 0.57%.

Still, it wasn't enough to tip the odds much. Those portfolios beat an all-index portfolio only 29% of the time, the study found.


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video


Regional brokerages are picking up assets, advisers from wirehouses

Senior columnist Bruce Kelly discusses with deputy editor Bob Hordt the impact of big brokerage houses pulling back on recruiting and regionals promising recruits less bureaucracy.

Latest news & opinion

8 adviser fears for 2019

Interest rates, trade wars and bear markets, oh my! Looking across the industry, here are some of the biggest concerns heading into the new year.

3 big reasons to do a Roth conversion right now

The time is ripe for many to convert a pretax IRA to a Roth.

10 must-know facts about today's 401(k) plans

Here are the latest changes in 401(k) plans across areas such as investments, fees, contributions, investment advice and more.

Questions abound as Ohio National stops commission payments this week

Advisers are grappling with how to proceed, with their clients and their businesses, as the insurer's new annuity trail policy takes effect.

Top 10 RIAs in the South

These are the largest registered investment advisory firms in the Southern U.S., based on AUM.


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print