Distinguish between registered and unregistered alts

Sep 29, 2013 @ 12:01 am

By Jeff Benjamin

As alternatives strategies continue to flood into the registered-mutual-fund and exchange-traded-fund arena, investors and financial advisers should be aware that most mutual funds and ETFs will never match up completely with private-investment products.

During a panel discussion last Tuesday at the InvestmentNews Alternative Investments Conference in Chicago, participants ticked off distinctions between registered and unregistered alternatives products ranging from fees and liquidity to the reality of manager skill levels.

“I think it's really hard to find a long-only manager who can short, because it's hard to develop those skills,” said Gary Black, global co-chief investment officer and chief investment officer of alternative investments at Calamos Investments LLC.

Despite the fact that the mutual fund industry has launched more than 600 alternatives strategy funds since the start of 2011, the panel generally agreed that advisers should approach most of the funds with caution. Of course, that advice also applies to alternatives outside the mutual fund space, including hedge funds.


Christian Hviid, managing principal with Point Guard Capital LLC, warned against being too attracted to the lower fees that accompany registered alternatives products, but also advised against paying too much for strategies that could be found inside a less expensive mutual fund.

“When it comes to fees, be careful what you pay for,” he said. “In some cases, there is a wide disparity in fees and not a lot of transparency, as far as what you're paying for.”

Mr. Hviid reminded the audience that most registered products don't have long track records, making that part of the due-diligence process more challenging.

He also advised investors to pay close attention to potential mismatches with regard to what a fund is offering in terms of strategy, and the skill and experience level of the management team.

On the issue of due diligence, Mr. Black said that he would be skeptical of any long-short mutual fund using ETFs for the short side of the portfolio, as opposed to picking individual stocks to sell short.

That is a red flag that the portfolio manager is less skilled on the short side of the portfolio, he said.

But as demand for noncorrelated strategies continues, the panel agreed that the fund industry will continue to crank out alternatives strategy products.

“We expect to see more funds crop up in nontraditional-bond-fund space,” said Susan Kelly, director of alternatives strategies at Commonwealth Financial Network.

In terms of the impact on the overall alternatives arena, including the $2.3 trillion hedge fund industry, she said that the growth of registered alternatives strategies is both attracting institutional investors and sending institutional investors back to the hedge funds to renegotiate the fee structures.

Hedge fund fees typically include a 2% management fee and a 20% performance fee, which compares with a roughly 1.5% fee for most alternatives mutual funds.

Mr. Hviid reminded advisers to keep their clients' best interests in mind when it comes to alternatives.

“You have to step back and ask if alternatives are even appropriate for your clients,” he said.

“Think about what strategies will offer the best complement to what they already own,” Mr. Hviid said. “It's not just a case of, "I must own alternatives.'”


What do you think?

View comments

Recommended next


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting investmentnews.com? It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist investmentnews.com

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print