Investment Intel

Investment Intelblog

Index vs. actively managed funds: It's not all about price

Or, how advisers can figure out which kind of fund is right for their clients

Nov 5, 2013 @ 8:12 am

By Andrew Ahrens

Visit the first tee at virtually any golf course, and you'll invariably witness the following scene play out: Dressed to impress and equipped with the newest, hottest set of clubs on the market, somebody will calmly stick a tee in the ground, address the ball and confidently take a rip — only to watch their ball fly deep into the woods. The next 17 holes will unfold in much the same way.

As an amateur golfer, I've seen this many times and the lesson is always the same: It's not the wand, it's the magician. If you're a terrible golfer, it doesn't matter what you wear or the clubs you use, you're still a terrible golfer. You could be wearing overalls and swinging a two by four, and the results probably would be about the same.

The same basic principle applies to helping clients choose the right investment vehicles: Wands have limited value if not wielded by a capable magician.

In the case of our industry, index funds that seek to track the market can be dressed up but they're simply designed to track the market or a particular slice of the market. But it takes seasoned pros who have demonstrated a continuous track record of success to set actively managed funds apart.

For many advisers, one of the key features distinguishing index and actively managed funds is price. Actively managed funds typically cost more, at least nominally. And while there is no doubt that management fees are an important consideration that advisers should cover thoroughly with their clients, it is just one of many factors to consider when compiling a portfolio that is in line with investor objectives.

The criteria that advisers should consider when determining whether actively managed or index funds are right for their clients include investor objectives, fund liquidity, safety, guarantees, fluctuation of principal and/or returns, and tax implications.

That said, it's important that advisers help clients find answers they can live with to the following three questions concerning index funds:

Is there limited upside opportunity? Because index funds seek only to track the market, what are the chances they will significantly outperform it? Logic would suggest that, generally speaking, such chances are relatively limited.

How much protection against downside risk is offered? Financial advisers and the clients they serve need to ask themselves: Are index funds far more vulnerable than actively managed funds when it comes to broad market trends? The very nature of indexing, which involves assembling a broad basket of representative securities, might indicate that this could be the case.

Are there hidden fees involved? If you are already looking at relatively limited upside potential and relatively higher risks of exposure to a broad market downturn, then how low an index fund's fees are becomes more critical. Advisers and their clients considering index funds need to ask themselves: Does the provider ramp up the real cost of a fund to make up the difference of the low-priced trading services they purport to offer?

With this in mind, there is a broad universe of actively managed funds that address some of the risks outlined above and that may charge lower fees. Ultimately, the key is to find one that combines active management with a reasonable price structure.

The following are four attributes I believe every actively managed fund should have:

Well-established players. Managers will come and go and funds will even change their name. Although past results are not indicative of future performance, I believe it's important to consider funds that have a proven track record of delivering results to investors for at least five years, preferably more.

Decision-making by committee. Some funds have a deep bench of qualified investment professionals who come together and make well-researched recommendations to an experienced fund manager. Not only can this type of arrangement potentially yield better results, it helps ensure that the fund's fortunes are not tied to a single individual. That said, some funds run by single individuals produce consistently solid returns year after year.

Falls within an ideal beta range. Beta measures a portfolio's volatility relative to its benchmark. Look for fund managers that consistently outperform the market without assuming a great deal of risk. Typically, such managers have a beta less than the S&P, which is 1. But everyone has different objectives, and investors willing to be a little more aggressive should not shy away from fund managers with betas greater than 1, if they think the potential performance justifies the additional risk.

Reasonable fee structure. For some investors, several years of great returns justify a hefty price tag. Remember, it may be OK to pay higher fees if you are getting the results you want. Sometimes, cheapskates get cheap results.

For advisers serving investors looking for low-cost options, index funds remain a very viable option. But with certain index funds, the fact is that you get what you pay for, which, in some cases, is not much. And while there's no question that some actively managed funds have outsized fee structures, I believe fees have become unfairly stigmatized in our industry.

In the end, some actively managed funds are everything their critics contend — unduly expensive, underperforming. But there remains a select group that have a proven ability to effectively balance performance, risk and fees, which makes them worthy of consideration.

Andrew Ahrens is chief executive of Ahrens Investment Partners, an independent wealth management firm.


What do you think?

View comments

Upcoming event

Oct 22


San Francisco Women Adviser Summit

The InvestmentNews Women Adviser Summit, a one-day workshop now held in six cities due to popular demand, is uniquely designed for the sophisticated female adviser who wants to take her personal and professional self to the next level.... Learn more

Most watched


Young professionals see lots of opportunity to reinvent the advice experience

Members of the 2019 InvestmentNews class of 40 Under 40 have strategies to overcome the challenges of being young in a mature industry.


Young advisers envision a radically different business in five years

Fintech and sustainable investing are two factors being watched closely by some of the 2019 class of InvestmentNews' 40 Under 40.

Latest news & opinion

Target-date fund design may be wrong for retirees

Researchers suggest the funds don't adequately hedge against sequence-of-returns risk in retirement.

InvestmentNews' 2019 class of 40 Under 40

Our 40 Under 40 project, now in its sixth year, highlights young talent in the financial advice industry. These individuals illustrate the tremendous potential of those coming up in the profession. These stories will surprise, entertain, educate and inspire.

New Jersey fiduciary rule: Pressure leads to public hearing, comment deadline extension

Industry push results in chance to air grievances on July 17 and another month to present objections.

Galvin to propose fiduciary rule for Massachusetts brokers

The secretary of the commonwealth is proposing a fiduciary standard in response to an SEC investment-advice rule he views as too weak.

Summer reading recommendations from financial advisers

Here are some books that will keep you informed and entertained during summer's downtime


Hi! Glad you're here and we hope you like all the great work we do here at InvestmentNews. But what we do is expensive and is funded in part by our sponsors. So won't you show our sponsors a little love by whitelisting It'll help us continue to serve you.

Yes, show me how to whitelist

Ad blocker detected. Please whitelist us or give premium a try.


Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print